Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26110658›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Pancreatitis in China: A Systematic Review.

Qianqian Meng, Lei Xin, Wenyu Liu, Han Lin, Bo Tian, Luowei Wang, Zhaoshen Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03241797 (Evaluation of EUS-guided FNA for Diagnosing Autoimmune Pancreatitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03241797 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of EUS-guided FNA for Diagnosing Autoimmune Pancreatitis: a Prospective, Single-center Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBin ChengRan2013 to 2017Enrolled27ConditionsAutoimmune PancreatitisArmsEUS-FNA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Transient Treatable Tumor of the Pancreas.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Autoimmune pancreatitis: What we know so far.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Radiomics model of dual-time 2-[European radiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Turkish Gastroenterology Association, Pancreas Study Group, Chronic Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  16. [Differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on multi-modality texture features inSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qianqian MengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Lei XinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wenyu LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Han LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Bo TianDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Luowei WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhaoshen LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo provide comprehensive data on the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) patients in China.

designA systematic review.

methodsAll clinical studies concerning AIP from China published between January 2006 and June 2014 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

resultsA total of 26 original articles involving 706 AIP patients were included with an estimated proportion of type 2 AIP as 4.7%. In the 706 AIP patients, the range of mean/median age was 48.6-67.0 years old and the male to female ratio was 4.47:1. The common presentations included obstructive jaundice (pooled rate: 63.4%, 95%CI: 55.4%-71.0%) and abdominal symptoms (pooled rate: 62.3%, 95%CI: 52.4%-71.7%). Biliary involvement was the most common extrapancreatic manifestations, especially the lower part of the common bile duct (pooled rate: 62.3%, 95%CI: 49.9%-73.9%). According to the imaging examinations, 53.8% and 41.6% patients were classified into focal-type and diffuse-type, respectively. Notably, upstream pancreatic duct dilatation was found in parts of patients (pooled rate: 13.8%, 95%CI: 6.6%-23.1%). The levels of serum IgG4 were elevated in most patients (pooled rate: 86.0%, 95%CI: 74.2%-94.6%). Nearly three tenths AIP patients received surgery (pooled rate: 29.7%, 95%CI: 18.1%-42.8%) due to mimicked malignancy. Steroid treatment was given to 78.4% patients (95%CI: 65.3%-89.1%) with a pooled remission rate of 96.2% (95%CI: 94.0%-97.9%). The pooled relapse rate was 13.8% (95%CI: 7.2%-22.0%) with the mean follow-up time ranging from 12 to 45 months.

conclusionType 1 is the predominant type of Chinese AIP patients and the clinical features, diagnostic modalities and therapeutic regimen were similar with those in other countries. Knowledge of AIP should be more widespread to avoid unnecessary surgery.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesChinaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GJaundice, ObstructiveMalePancreatitisRetrospective StudiesImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID26110658
PMCPMC4481503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.