Exploring Host-Pathogen Interactions through Biological Control.

Francesca Di Giallonardo, Edward C Holmes

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

4citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

Making the best of research investment in pathogens control through biocontrol. How is research correlated with agricultural microbial biological control product availability?PLoS pathogens · 2023
Article
A recombinant adenoviral vector with a specific tropism to CD4-positive cells: a new tool for HIV-1 inhibition.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022
Article
Metagenomic discovery and co-infection of diverse wobbly possum disease viruses and a novel hepacivirus in Australian brushtail possums.One health outlook · 2019
Article
Predicting virus emergence amid evolutionary noise.Open biology · 2017
Review

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francesca Di GiallonardoMarie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Edward C HolmesMarie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

Genomic analysis of the canonical case of virulence evolution: Myxomatosis in AuR01AI093804 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI READ, ANDREW F. · 2012 to 2016

$2.7M

NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093804NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093804-01A1

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsHost-Pathogen InteractionsPest Control, Biological

Identifiers

PMID26110272

DOI10.1371/journal.ppat.1004865

PMCPMC4482387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.