ArticleThe British journal of radiology2015
Relative percentage signal intensity recovery of perfusion metrics—an efficient tool for differentiating grades of glioma.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cerebral and tumoral blood flow in adult gliomas: a systematic review of results from magnetic resonance imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2021Pooled it
- Article
- Differentiating IDH-mutant astrocytomas and 1p19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas using DSC-PWI: high performance through cerebral blood volume and percentage of signal recovery percentiles.European radiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Computed tomography perfusion imaging evaluation of angiogenesis in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Hemodynamic Imaging in Cerebral Diffuse Glioma-Part A: Concept, Differential Diagnosis and Tumor Grading.Cancers · 2022Review
- Brain Tumor Characterization Using Multibiometric Evaluation of MRI.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2018Article
- Clinical Applications of Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI Techniques in Gliomas: Recent Advances and Current Challenges.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2017Review
- Accuracy of percentage of signal intensity recovery and relative cerebral blood volume derived from dynamic susceptibility-weighted, contrast-enhanced MRI in the preoperative diagnosis of cerebral tumours.The neuroradiology journal · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGlioma classification and characterization may be facilitated by a multiparametric approach of perfusion metrics, which could not be achieved by conventional MRI alone. Our aim is to explore the potential of relative percentage signal intensity recovery (rPSR) values, in addition to relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) of first-pass T2* dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion MRI, in differentiating high- and low-grade glioma.
methodsThis prospective study included 39 patients with low-grade and 25 patients with high-grade glioma. rPSR, rCBV and rCBF were calculated from the first-pass T2* DSC perfusion MRI. rPSR was calculated using standard software and validated with dedicated perfusion metrics analysis software. The statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
resultsVariation in rPSR, rCBV and rCBF values between low- and high-grade gliomas were statistically significant (p < 0.005). The ROC curve analysis for each of them yielded 96% sensitivity and 71.8% specificity; 88% sensitivity and 69.2% specificity; and 72% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity. The area under the curve (AUC) from the ROC curve analysis yielded 0.893, 0.852 and 0.702 for rPSR, rCBV and rCBF, respectively. The rPSR calculation with the validation software yielded 92.3% sensitivity and 72% specificity with an AUC of 0.864.
conclusionrPSR inversely correlates while rCBV and rCBF values directly correlate with the tumour grade. Furthermore, the overall diagnostic performance of rPSR is better than rCBV and rCBF values. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: rPSR of T2* DSC perfusion is an indicator of blood-brain barrier status and lesion leakiness, which has not been explored yet compared with the usual haemodynamic parameters, rCBV and rCBF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.