Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26110112›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2015

Disruption of caudate working memory activation in chronic blast-related traumatic brain injury.

Mary R Newsome, Sally Durgerian, Lyla Mourany, Randall S Scheibel, Mark J Lowe, Erik B Beall, Katherine A Koenig, Michael Parsons, Maya Troyanskaya, Christine Reece and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mary R NewsomeResearch Service Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Sally DurgerianDepartment of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Lyla MouranySchey Center for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Randall S ScheibelResearch Service Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Mark J LoweImaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Erik B BeallImaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Katherine A KoenigImaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Michael ParsonsSchey Center for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Maya TroyanskayaResearch Service Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Christine ReeceSchey Center for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Elisabeth WildeResearch Service Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Barbara L FischerGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Wm. S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Affairs Hospital, Madison, WI, USA.
Stephen E JonesImaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Rajan AgarwalDiagnostic and Therapeutic Care, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA ; Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Harvey S LevinResearch Service Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Stephen M RaoSchey Center for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

Neuroimaging Meditation Therapy in Veterans with Co-morbid Mild TBI and PTSDI21RX001608 · VA · MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI NEWSOME, MARY R · 2015 to 2018
–
RRD VA I21 RX001608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mild to moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to blast exposure is frequently diagnosed in veterans returning from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. However, it is unclear whether neural damage resulting from blast TBI differs from that found in TBI due to blunt-force trauma (e.g., falls and motor vehicle crashes). Little is also known about the effects of blast TBI on neural networks, particularly over the long term. Because impairment in working memory has been linked to blunt-force TBI, the present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study sought to investigate whether brain activation in response to a working memory task would discriminate blunt-force from blast TBI. Twenty-five veterans (mean age = 29.8 years, standard deviation = 6.01 years, 1 female) who incurred TBI due to blast an average of 4.2 years prior to enrollment and 25 civilians (mean age = 27.4 years, standard deviation = 6.68 years, 4 females) with TBI due to blunt-force trauma performed the Sternberg Item Recognition Task while undergoing fMRI. The task involved encoding 1, 3, or 5 items in working memory. A group of 25 veterans (mean age = 29.9 years, standard deviation = 5.53 years, 0 females) and a group of 25 civilians (mean age = 27.3 years, standard deviation = 5.81 years, 0 females) without history of TBI underwent identical imaging procedures and served as controls. Results indicated that the civilian TBI group and both control groups demonstrated a monotonic relationship between working memory set size and activation in the right caudate during encoding, whereas the blast TBI group did not (p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons using False Discovery Rate). Blast TBI was also associated with worse performance on the Sternberg Item Recognition Task relative to the other groups, although no other group differences were found on neuropsychological measures of episodic memory, inhibition, and general processing speed. These results could not be attributed to caudate atrophy or the presence of PTSD symptoms. Our results point to a specific vulnerability of the caudate to blast injury. Changes in activation during the Sternberg Item Recognition Task, and potentially other tasks that recruit the caudate, may serve as biomarkers for blast TBI.

Indexed as

AdultAfghan Campaign 2001-Blast InjuriesBrain Injury, ChronicCaudate NucleusFemaleHumansIraq War, 2003-2011Magnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory DisordersMemory, Short-TermVeteransYoung AdultConcussionCortical plasticityfMRITraumatic brain injuryVeteranWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID26110112
PMCPMC4477106
OpenAlexW778067920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.