Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26110108›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2015

Cortical thickness estimation in longitudinal stroke studies: A comparison of 3 measurement methods.

Qi Li, Heath Pardoe, Renee Lichter, Emilio Werden, Audrey Raffelt, Toby Cumming, Amy Brodtmann

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structural plasticity of remote cortical brain regions is determined by connectivity to the primary lesion in subcortical stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2015
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Influence of Processing Pipeline on Cortical Thickness Measurement.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qi LiThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Heath PardoeThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia ; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia ; Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York University, New York, USA.
Renee LichterThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia ; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Emilio WerdenThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia ; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Audrey RaffeltThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Toby CummingThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia ; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Amy BrodtmannThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia ; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is considerable controversy about the causes of cognitive decline after stroke, with evidence for both the absence and coexistence of Alzheimer pathology. A reduction in cortical thickness has been shown to be an important biomarker for the progression of many neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, brain volume changes following stroke are not well described. Cortical thickness estimation presents an ideal way to detect regional and global post-stroke brain atrophy. In this study, we imaged a group of patients in the first month after stroke and at 3 months. We compared three methods of estimating cortical thickness on unmasked images: one surface-based (FreeSurfer) and two voxel-based methods (a Laplacian method and a registration method, DiRecT). We used three benchmarks for our analyses: accuracy of segmentation (especially peri-lesional performance), reproducibility, and biological validity. We found important differences between these methods in cortical thickness values and performance in high curvature areas and peri-lesional regions, but similar reproducibility metrics. FreeSurfer had less reliance on manual boundary correction than the other two methods, while reproducibility was highest in the Laplacian method. A discussion of the caveats for each method and recommendations for use in a stroke population is included. We conclude that both surface- and voxel-based methods are valid for estimating cortical thickness in stroke populations.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCerebral CortexFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedStrokeBiomarkersComparisonCortical thicknessStrokeSurface-basedVoxel-based

Identifiers

PMID26110108
PMCPMC4475863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.