Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26109975›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2015

Challenges of the ward round teaching based on the experiences of medical clinical teachers.

Kamran Soltani Arabshahi, Fariba Haghani, Shoaleh Bigdeli, Athar Omid, Peyman Adibi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2019
    Article
  12. Strategies for teaching in clinical rounds: A systematic review of the literature.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Clinical teaching with emotional intelligence: A teaching toolbox.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kamran Soltani ArabshahiDepartment of Medical Education, Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran.
Fariba HaghaniDepartment of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan.
Shoaleh BigdeliDepartment of Medical Education, Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran.
Athar OmidDepartment of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan.
Peyman AdibiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHolding educational sessions in a clinical environment is a major concern for faculty members because of its special difficulties and restrictions. This study attempts to recognize the challenges of the ward round teaching through investigating the experiences of clinical teachers in 2011. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis qualitative research is carried out through purposive sampling with maximum variation from among the clinical teachers of major departments in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (9 persons). The sampling continued until data saturation. Data were collected through semi-structured interview and analyzed through Collaizzi method. Data reliability and validity was confirmed through the four aspects of Lincoln and Guba method (credibility, conformability, transferability, and dependability).

resultsThree major themes and their related sub-themes (minor themes) were found out including the factors related to the triad of clinical teaching (patient, learner, and clinical teacher) (concern about patient's welfare, poor preparation, lack of motivation, ethical problems), factors related to the educational environment (stressful environment, humiliating environment and poor communication) and the factors related to the educational system of the clinical environment (poor organizing and arrangement of resources, poor system's monitoring, bad planning and inadequate resource).

conclusionWard round teaching has many concerns for teachers, and this should be recognized and resolved by authorities and teachers. If these problems are not resolved, it would affect the quality of clinical teaching.

Indexed as

Challengeclinical teacherclinical teachingqualitative studyward round teaching

Identifiers

PMID26109975
PMCPMC4468233
OpenAlexW394292822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.