Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26109968›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2015

Comparison of the effect of topical versus systemic L-arginine on wound healing in acute incisional diabetic rat model.

Alireza Zandifar, Sima Seifabadi, Ehsan Zandifar, Sajedeh Sohrabi Beheshti, Abolfazl Aslani, Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alireza ZandifarPhysiology Research Center and Department of Physiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran ; Medical Student Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Sima SeifabadiPhysiology Research Center and Department of Physiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran ; Pharmacy Student Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan ; Department of Pharmaceutics and Novel Drug Delivery Systems Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ehsan ZandifarPhysiology Research Center and Department of Physiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran ; Medical Student Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Sajedeh Sohrabi BeheshtiPhysiology Research Center and Department of Physiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran ; Medical Student Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran ; Department of Physiology, Isfahan Payame Noor University, Isfahan, Iran.
Abolfazl AslaniDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Novel Drug Delivery Systems Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Shaghayegh Haghjooy JavanmardPhysiology Research Center and Department of Physiology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes is associated with endothelial dysfunction and impaired wound healing. The amino acid L-arginine is the only substrate for nitric oxide (NO) synthesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the topical versus systemic L-arginine treatment on total nitrite (NOx) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentrations in wound fluid and rate of wound healing in an acute incisional diabetic wound model. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 56 Sprague-Dawley rats were used of which 32 were rendered diabetic. Animals underwent a dorsal skin incision. Dm-sys-arg group (N = 8, diabetic) and Norm-sys-arg group (N = 8, normoglycemic) were gavaged with L-arginine. Dm-sys-control group (N = 8, diabetic) and Norm-sys-control group (N = 8, normoglycemic) were gavaged with water. Dm-top-arg group (N = 8, diabetic) and norm-top-arg group (N = 8, normoglycemic) received topical L-arginine gel. Dm-top-control group (N = 8, diabetic) received gel vehicle. On the day 5 the amount of NOx in wound fluid was measured by Griess reaction. VEGF/total protein in wound fluids was also measured on day 5 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All wound tissue specimens were fixed and stained to be evaluated for rate of healing. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 18.0, Chicago, IL, USA) through One-way analysis of variance test and Tukey's post-hoc.

resultsIn dm-sys-arg group, the level of NOx on day 5 was significantly more than dm-top-arg group (P < 0.05). VEGF content in L-arginine treated groups were significantly more than controls (P < 0.05). Rate of diabetic wound healing in dm-sys-arg group was significantly more than dm-top-arg group.

conclusionSystemic L-arginine is more efficient than topical L-arginine in wound healing. This process is mediated at least in part, by increasing VEGF and NO in the wound fluid.

Indexed as

L-argininenitric oxidestreptozotocinvascular endothelial growth factorwound healing

Identifiers

PMID26109968
PMCPMC4468226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.