Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26109963›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2015

Ligustrazine monomer against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Hai-Jun Gao, Peng-Fei Liu, Pei-Wen Li, Zhuo-Yan Huang, Feng-Bo Yu, Ting Lei, Yong Chen, Ye Cheng, Qing-Chun Mu, Hai-Yan Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Intranasal essential oils in therapy: advances in clinical applications and delivery mechanisms.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hai-Jun GaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China ; Department of Neurosurgery, Hongqi Hospital of Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Peng-Fei LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.
Pei-Wen LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.
Zhuo-Yan HuangClinical Medical College of Beihua University, Jilin, Jilin Province, China.
Feng-Bo YuSchool of Pharmacy, Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Ting LeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.
Yong ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.
Ye ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.
Qing-Chun MuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hongqi Hospital of Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Hai-Yan HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.
First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University · CNMudanjiang Medical University · CNBeihua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ligustrazine (2,3,5,6-tetramethylpyrazine) is a major active ingredient of the Szechwan lovage rhizome and is extensively used in treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular disease. The mechanism of action of ligustrazine use against ischemic cerebrovascular diseases remains unclear at present. This study summarizes its protective effect, the optimum time window of administration, and the most effective mode of administration for clinical treatment of cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. We examine the effects of ligustrazine on suppressing excitatory amino acid release, promoting migration, differentiation and proliferation of endogenous neural stem cells. We also looked at its effects on angiogenesis and how it inhibits thrombosis, the inflammatory response, and apoptosis after cerebral ischemia. We consider that ligustrazine gives noticeable protection from cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. The time window of ligustrazine administration is limited. The protective effect and time window of a series of derivative monomers of ligustrazine such as 2-[(1,1-dimethylethyl)oxidoimino]methyl]-3,5,6-trimethylpyrazine, CXC137 and CXC195 after cerebral ischemia were better than ligustrazine.

Indexed as

cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injuryischemialigustrazinenerve regenerationneural regeneration

Identifiers

PMID26109963
PMCPMC4468780
OpenAlexW2132069300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.