Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26109781›Full record

ReviewPharmacognosy research2015

Cinnamon: Mystic powers of a minute ingredient.

Pallavi Kawatra, Rathai Rajagopalan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacognosy research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04790760 (Glucose Differences Between the Left Arm and Right Arm in Diabetic Patients Using a Continuous Glucose Monitor), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04790760 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Glucose Differences Between the Left Arm and Right Arm in Diabetic Patients Using a Continuous Glucose Monitor

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of the PacificRan2021 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsDiabetesArmsSupplement Consumption, Continuous Glucose Monitors
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Effect of Herbal Extract ofInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Aqueous Extract of Cinnamon (Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The Impact of Addition OatsSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pallavi KawatraDepartment of Pharmacology, M.S Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Rathai RajagopalanDepartment of Pharmacology, M.S Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
M.S. Ramaiah Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cinnamon, due to its exotic flavor and aroma, is a key ingredient in the kitchen of every household. From the beginning of its use in 2800 BC by our ancestors for various purposes such as anointment, embalming and various ailments, it has instigated the interest of many researchers. Recently many trials have explored the beneficial effects of cinnamon in Parkinsons, diabetes, blood, and brain. After extensive research on PubMed and Google scholar, data were collected regarding its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antilipemic, antidiabetic, antimicrobial, and anticancer effect. This systematic review underlines the surplus health benefits of this clandestine ingredient and the scope of further research in these clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

Bloodcinnamondiabetesparkinsons

Identifiers

PMID26109781
PMCPMC4466762
OpenAlexW1578928232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.