Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26109686›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2016

Hope and mood changes throughout the primary brain tumor illness trajectory.

Alvina A Acquaye, Lin Lin, Elizabeth Vera-Bolanos, Mark R Gilbert, Terri S Armstrong

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Stigma and related influencing factors in brain cancer patients: a cross-sectional study and parallel mediation analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alvina A AcquayeDepartment of Family Health, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Nursing, Houston, Texas (A.A.A.); Department of Family Health, The University of California, San Francisco, California (L.L.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (E.V.-B., T.S.A.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G.); Department of Family Health, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Nursing, Houston, Texas (T.S.A.).
Lin LinDepartment of Family Health, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Nursing, Houston, Texas (A.A.A.); Department of Family Health, The University of California, San Francisco, California (L.L.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (E.V.-B., T.S.A.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G.); Department of Family Health, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Nursing, Houston, Texas (T.S.A.).
Elizabeth Vera-BolanosDepartment of Family Health, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Nursing, Houston, Texas (A.A.A.); Department of Family Health, The University of California, San Francisco, California (L.L.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (E.V.-B., T.S.A.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G.); Department of Family Health, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Nursing, Houston, Texas (T.S.A.).
Mark R GilbertDepartment of Family Health, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Nursing, Houston, Texas (A.A.A.); Department of Family Health, The University of California, San Francisco, California (L.L.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (E.V.-B., T.S.A.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G.); Department of Family Health, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Nursing, Houston, Texas (T.S.A.).
Terri S ArmstrongDepartment of Family Health, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Nursing, Houston, Texas (A.A.A.); Department of Family Health, The University of California, San Francisco, California (L.L.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (E.V.-B., T.S.A.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G.); Department of Family Health, University of Texas Health Science Center School of Nursing, Houston, Texas (T.S.A.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ambiguity of defining hope impacts the level of readiness faced by health care professionals treating patients with glioma, a disease with unpredictable outcomes. This study describes the report of hope and the relationship between hope and mood in adult brain tumor patients at various points in the illness trajectory.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study with data collection including use of the Herth Hope Index (HHI), the Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS-SF), and clinical information. Descriptive statistics were used to report sample characteristics. Spearman's rho and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare and differentiate scores.

resultsEighty-two patients ranging in age from 22 to 78 years (median, 44.5 y) participated in the study. Patients were primarily male (57.3%), married (76.8%), and had a high-grade glioma (35.4%). Nearly half had recurrence, and more than 20% were on active treatment. The overall HHI total score for the sample was 41.32 (range: 13-48). Patients with recurrence had a lower HHI interconnectedness (median = 14.00) score and higher total mood disturbance (median = 14.00) compared with patients without recurrence (median = 15.00 and median = 0.00, respectively; P < .05). All negative mood states on the POMS-SF were negatively correlated with HHI subscales.

conclusionsOverall, patients reporting more hope also reported less overall mood disturbance As expected, patients with tumor recurrence reported lower hope and higher mood disturbance than those who were newly diagnosed or without recurrence. Targeting interventions specifically tailored to an individual's needs for improvement in quality of life throughout the disease course may include measures to address hope in order to facilitate positive coping strategies.

Indexed as

AffectDisease ProgressionHopeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultbrain tumorsgliomahopemood changesquality of life

Identifiers

PMID26109686
PMCPMC4677410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.