Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26109400›Full record

SynthesisIntensive care medicine2015

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review.

Michael C Sklar, Francois Beloncle, Christina M Katsios, Laurent Brochard, Jan O Friedrich

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of extracorporeal COCritical care (London, England) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of extracorporeal COFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Extracorporeal COBMJ open respiratory research · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The use of extracorporeal COAnnals of intensive care · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Physiological effects of adding ECCOAnnals of intensive care · 2020
    Article
  19. A COJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael C SklarDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Francois BeloncleKeenan Research Centre and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Christina M KatsiosKeenan Research Centre and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Laurent BrochardKeenan Research Centre and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. brochardl@smh.ca.
Jan O FriedrichKeenan Research Centre and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversité d'Angers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExtracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) has been proposed for hypercapnic respiratory failure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations, to avoid intubation or reduce length of invasive ventilation. Balance of risks, efficacy, and benefits of ECCO2R in patients with COPD is unclear.

methodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify all publications reporting use of ECCO2R in COPD. We looked at physiological and clinical efficacy. A favorable outcome was defined as prevention of intubation or successful extubation. Major and minor complications were compiled.

resultsWe identified 3123 citations. Ten studies (87 patients), primarily case series, met inclusion criteria. ECCO2R prevented intubation in 65/70 (93%) patients and assisted in the successful extubation of 9/17 (53%) mechanically ventilated subjects. One case-control study matching to noninvasively ventilated controls reported lower intubation rates and hospital mortality with ECCO2R that trended toward significance. Physiological data comparing pre- to post-ECCO2R changes suggest improvements for pH (0.07-0.15 higher), PaCO2 (25 mmHg lower), and respiratory rate (7 breaths/min lower), but not PaO2/FiO2. Studies reported 11 major (eight bleeds requiring blood transfusion of 2 units, and three line-related complications, including one death related to retroperitoneal bleeding) and 30 minor complications (13 bleeds, five related to anticoagulation, and nine clotting-related device malfunctions resulting in two emergent intubations).

conclusionThe technique is still experimental and no randomized trial is available. Recognizing selection bias associated with case series, there still appears to be potential for benefit of ECCO2R in patients with COPD exacerbations. However, it is associated with frequent and potentially severe complications. Higher-quality studies are required to better elucidate this risk-benefit balance.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarbon DioxideCase-Control StudiesExtracorporeal CirculationFemaleHumansHypercapniaMaleMiddle AgedNoninvasive VentilationPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory InsufficiencyRisk AssessmentCarbon DioxideAcute respiratory failureHypercapniaNoninvasive ventilation

Identifiers

PMID26109400
OpenAlexW878407356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.