Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26109384›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2015

'A bite before bed': exposure to malaria vectors outside the times of net use in the highlands of western Kenya.

Mary K Cooke, Sam C Kahindi, Robin M Oriango, Chrispin Owaga, Elizabeth Ayoma, Danspaid Mabuka, Dennis Nyangau, Lucy Abel, Elizabeth Atieno, Stephen Awuor and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mosquito feeding behavior and how it influences residual malaria transmission across Africa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mary K CookeFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. cookemk7@gmail.com.
Sam C KahindiKenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Global Health Research/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya. kahindisamuel@gmail.com.
Robin M OriangoKenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Global Health Research/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya. robin.migiro@rocketmail.com.
Chrispin OwagaKenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Global Health Research/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya. cowaga@gmail.com.
Elizabeth AyomaKenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Global Health Research/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya. eayoma@kemricdc.org.
Danspaid MabukaKenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Global Health Research/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya. mabukadan@gmail.com.
Dennis NyangauKenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Global Health Research/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya. finddenis@yahoo.com.
Lucy AbelKenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Global Health Research/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya. lucycayth@gmail.com.
Elizabeth AtienoKenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Global Health Research/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya. lizmalinaelizabeth@yahoo.com.
Stephen AwuorKenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Global Health Research/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya. stephenawuor@yahoo.com.
Chris DrakeleyFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. chris.drakeley@lshtm.ac.uk.
Jonathan CoxFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. jonathan.cox@lshtm.ac.uk.
Jennifer StevensonFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. jennyc.stevenson@macharesearch.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe human population in the highlands of Nyanza Province, western Kenya, is subject to sporadic epidemics of Plasmodium falciparum. Indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs) are used widely in this area. These interventions are most effective when Anopheles rest and feed indoors and when biting occurs at times when individuals use LLINs. It is therefore important to test the current assumption of vector feeding preferences, and late night feeding times, in order to estimate the extent to which LLINs protect the inhabitants from vector bites.

methodsMosquito collections were made for six consecutive nights each month between June 2011 and May 2012. CDC light-traps were set next to occupied LLINs inside and outside randomly selected houses and emptied hourly. The net usage of residents, their hours of house entry and exit and times of sleeping were recorded and the individual hourly exposure to vectors indoors and outdoors was calculated. Using these data, the true protective efficacy of nets (P*), for this population was estimated, and compared between genders, age groups and from month to month.

resultsPrimary vector species (Anopheles funestus s.l. and Anopheles arabiensis) were more likely to feed indoors but the secondary vector Anopheles coustani demonstrated exophagic behaviour (p < 0.05). A rise in vector biting activity was recorded at 19:30 outdoors and 18:30 indoors. Individuals using LLINs experienced a moderate reduction in their overall exposure to malaria vectors from 1.3 to 0.47 bites per night. The P* for the population over the study period was calculated as 51% and varied significantly with age and season (p < 0.01).

conclusionsIn the present study, LLINs offered the local population partial protection against malaria vector bites. It is likely that P* would be estimated to be greater if the overall suppression of the local vector population due to widespread community net use could be taken into account. However, the overlap of early biting habit of vectors and human activity in this region indicates that additional methods of vector control are required to limit transmission. Regular surveillance of both vector behaviour and domestic human-behaviour patterns would assist the planning of future control interventions in this region.

Indexed as

Insecticide-Treated BednetsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsAnophelesChildChild, PreschoolCircadian RhythmFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInsect Bites and Stings

Identifiers

PMID26109384
PMCPMC4479228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.