Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26109280›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience bulletin2015

Experimental models of neuromyelitis optica: current status, challenges and future directions.

Minshu Li, Yaping Yan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience bulletin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Combined platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and blood-brain barrier biomarkers as indicators of disability in acute neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Neonatal Fc Receptor-Targeted Therapies in Neurology.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neuroinflammation.Neuroscience bulletin · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Minshu LiDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Yaping YanDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Neurological Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China. yaping.yan@tijmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a recurrent inflammatory disease that predominantly attacks the opticnerves and spinal cord. NMO-IgG, the specific autoantibody present in the vast majority of NMO patients, targets the astrocytic water channel protein aquaporin 4 (AQP4), and differentiates NMO from multiple sclerosis. The growing clinical and research interest in NMO makes it urgent to produce an animal model of NMO. The pathogenic effect of anti-AQP4 antibodies derived from the serum of patients paves the way to generating an experimental model based on the anti-AQP4-mediated astrocyte damage. In this review, we discuss the contribution of experimental models to the understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease and drug development. Key questions raised by the existing models are also discussed.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalNeuromyelitis OpticaAnimalsHumansanimal modelastrocyteneuromyelitis opticaNMO-IgG

Identifiers

PMID26109280
PMCPMC5563723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.