Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26108968›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Gene expression analysis of skin grafts and cultured keratinocytes using synthetic RNA normalization reveals insights into differentiation and growth control.

Shintaro Katayama, Tiina Skoog, Eeva-Mari Jouhilahti, H Annika Siitonen, Kristo Nuutila, Mari H Tervaniemi, Jyrki Vuola, Anna Johnsson, Peter Lönnerberg, Sten Linnarsson and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rapid Chemical Profiling ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Single-cell transcriptome analysis of endometrial tissue.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shintaro KatayamaDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute and Center for Innovative Medicine, Huddinge, Sweden. shintaro.katayama@ki.se.
Tiina SkoogDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute and Center for Innovative Medicine, Huddinge, Sweden. tiina.skoog@ki.se.
Eeva-Mari JouhilahtiDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute and Center for Innovative Medicine, Huddinge, Sweden. eeva-mari.jouhilahti@ki.se.
H Annika SiitonenFolkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Helsinki, Finland. annika.siitonen@gmail.com.
Kristo NuutilaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. kristo.nuutila@helsinki.fi.
Mari H TervaniemiFolkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Helsinki, Finland. mari.h.tervaniemi@helsinki.fi.
Jyrki VuolaHelsinki Burn Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. jyrki.vuola@hus.fi.
Anna JohnssonDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. anna.johnsson@ki.se.
Peter LönnerbergDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. peter.lonnerberg@ki.se.
Sten LinnarssonDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. sten.linnarsson@ki.se.
Outi ElomaaFolkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Helsinki, Finland. outi.elomaa@helsinki.fi.
Esko KankuriDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. esko.kankuri@helsinki.fi.
Juha KereDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute and Center for Innovative Medicine, Huddinge, Sweden. juha.kere@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKeratinocytes (KCs) are the most frequent cells in the epidermis, and they are often isolated and cultured in vitro to study the molecular biology of the skin. Cultured primary cells and various immortalized cells have been frequently used as skin models but their comparability to intact skin has been questioned. Moreover, when analyzing KC transcriptomes, fluctuation of polyA+ RNA content during the KCs' lifecycle has been omitted.

resultsWe performed STRT RNA sequencing on 10 ng samples of total RNA from three different sample types: i) epidermal tissue (split-thickness skin grafts), ii) cultured primary KCs, and iii) HaCaT cell line. We observed significant variation in cellular polyA+ RNA content between tissue and cell culture samples of KCs. The use of synthetic RNAs and SAMstrt in normalization enabled comparison of gene expression levels in the highly heterogenous samples and facilitated discovery of differences between the tissue samples and cultured cells. The transcriptome analysis sensitively revealed genes involved in KC differentiation in skin grafts and cell cycle regulation related genes in cultured KCs and emphasized the fluctuation of transcription factors and non-coding RNAs associated to sample types.

conclusionsThe epidermal keratinocytes derived from tissue and cell culture samples showed highly different polyA+ RNA contents. The use of SAMstrt and synthetic RNA based normalization allowed the comparison between tissue and cell culture samples and thus proved to be valuable tools for RNA-seq analysis with translational approach. Transciptomics revealed clear difference both between tissue and cell culture samples and between primary KCs and immortalized HaCaT cells.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationEpidermisGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansKeratinocytesRNARNA, MessengerSequence Analysis, RNASkinSkin TransplantationRNARNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID26108968
PMCPMC4480911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.