Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26108953›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Mechanics of mouse ocular motor plant quantified by optogenetic techniques.

John S Stahl, Zachary C Thumser, Paul J May, Francisco H Andrade, Sean R Anderson, Paul Dean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Adaptive Acceleration of Visually Evoked Smooth Eye Movements in Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John S StahlNeurology Division, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; jss6@case.edu.
Zachary C ThumserNeurology Division, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio;
Paul J MayDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomical Sciences, University of Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi;
Francisco H AndradeDepartment of Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky;
Sean R AndersonDepartment of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; and.
Paul DeanDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Funding

MIDBRAIN CIRCUITRY FOR NEURONAL CONTROL OF GAZER01EY014263 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER · PI GAMLIN, PAUL DOUGLAS, MAY, PAUL J · 2003 to 2018
$5.2M
DETERMINANTS OF EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLE FUNCTIONR01EY012998 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ANDRADE, FRANCISCO H · 2001 to 2010
$2.8M
Extraocular muscle aging: Functional and genomic changesR03EY013724 · NEI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDRADE, FRANCISCO H · 2002 to 2004
$453k
Impact of EOM specific myosin loss on extraocular muscle structure and functionR21EY024347 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ANDRADE, FRANCISCO H · 2014 to 2015
$406k
NEI NIH HHS EY014263NEI NIH HHS EY024347NEI NIH HHS EY12998NEI NIH HHS EY13724NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014263NEI NIH HHS R21 EY024347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rigorous descriptions of ocular motor mechanics are often needed for models of ocular motor circuits. The mouse has become an important tool for ocular motor studies, yet most mechanical data come from larger species. Recordings of mouse abducens neurons indicate the mouse mechanics share basic viscoelastic properties with larger species but have considerably longer time constants. Time constants can also be extracted from the rate at which the eye re-centers when released from an eccentric position. The displacement can be accomplished by electrically stimulating ocular motor nuclei, but electrical stimulation may also activate nearby ocular motor circuitry. We achieved specific activation of abducens motoneurons through photostimulation in transgenic mice expressing channelrhodopsin in cholinergic neurons. Histology confirmed strong channelrhodopsin expression in the abducens nucleus with relatively little expression in nearby ocular motor structures. Stimulation was delivered as 20- to 1,000-ms pulses and 40-Hz trains. Relaxations were modeled best by a two-element viscoelastic system. Time constants were sensitive to stimulus duration. Analysis of isometric relaxation of isolated mouse extraocular muscles suggest the dependence is attributable to noninstantaneous decay of active forces in non-twitch fibers following stimulus offset. Time constants were several times longer than those obtained in primates, confirming that the mouse ocular motor mechanics are relatively sluggish. Finally, we explored the effects of 0.1- to 20-Hz sinusoidal photostimuli and demonstrated their potential usefulness in characterizing ocular motor mechanics, although this application will require further data on the temporal relationship between photostimulation and neuronal firing in extraocular motoneurons.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsAbducens NerveAnimalsCholinergic NeuronsMiceMotor NeuronsMuscle ContractionOptogeneticsRhodopsinRhodopsinextraocular musclemechanicsoculomotortime constantviscoelastic

Identifiers

PMID26108953
PMCPMC4556846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.