ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2015
Sex-Specific Disparities in Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for assessing coronary artery disease risk in postmenopausal women: a dual-center retrospective study.Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Article
- Recent Trends in Cardiovascular Mortality in Rio de Janeiro State Health Regions and Capital.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021Article
- Structure of communities in semantic networks of biomedical research on disparities in health and sexismBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2020Review
- Gender differences in acute coronary syndromes patterns during the COVID-19 outbreak.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2020Article
- Gender Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Adults With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018Article
- Gender and Race Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors among New York City Adults: New York City Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NYC HANES) 2013-2014.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2018Article
- Gender Differences in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2018Review
- Sex-associated differences in baseline urinary metabolites of healthy adults.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Sex Differences in Outcomes after Stroke in Patients with Diabetes in Ontario, Canada.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2018Article
- Effect of GnRHR polymorphisms on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.Journal of human genetics · 2017Article
- Ischemia/Reperfusion.Comprehensive Physiology · 2016Review
- A Retrospective Observational Study of Anesthetic Induction Dosing Practices in Female Elderly Surgical Patients: Are We Overdosing Older Patients?Drugs & aging · 2016Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past two decades, focused research on women at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) has helped to clarify our understanding of some of the sex-specific factors that are important in the prevention and early detection of coronary atherosclerosis with a resultant 30 % decrease in the number of women dying from CVD. In spite of these advances, CVD, specifically, ischemic heart disease due to coronary atherosclerosis is the leading cause of cardiovascular death of women in the USA. The 2010 landmark Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, "Women's Health Research--Progress, Pitfalls and Promise," highlighted the fact that although major progress had been made in reducing cardiovascular mortality in women, there were disparities in disease burden among subgroups of women, particularly those women who are socially disadvantaged because of race, ethnicity, income level, and educational attainment [1]. The IOM recommended targeted research on these subpopulations of women with the highest risk and burden of disease. Causes of disparities are multifactorial and are related to differences in risk factor prevalence, access to care, use of evidence-based guidelines, and social and environmental factors. In this article, we review a few of the contributing factors to the disparities in ischemic heart disease in women with a focus on the subgroups of women of Black, Latino, and South Asian descent who are at high risk for morbidity and mortality from CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26108894What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.