Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26108878›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2015

Internalization, Trafficking, Intracellular Processing and Actions of Antibody-Drug Conjugates.

Shi Xu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Resistance to antibody-drug conjugates: A review.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shi XuScientific Development Manager, Discovery Biology, GenScript USA Inc., 860 Centennial Ave., Piscataway, New Jersey, 08854, USA. ben.xu@genscript.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis review discusses the molecular mechanism involved in the targeting and delivery of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), the new class of biopharmaceuticals mainly designed for targeted cancer therapy.

methodsthis review goes over major progress in preclinical and clinical studies of ADCs, in the past 5 years.

resultsThe pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ADCs involve multiple mechanisms, including internalization of ADCs by target cells, intracellular trafficking, release of conjugated drugs, and payload.

conclusionThese mechanisms actually jointly determine the efficacy of ADCs. Therefore, the optimization of ADCs should take them as necessary rationales.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugatesAnimalsBystander EffectDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DiscoveryDrug LiberationHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyPinocytosisProtein BindingReceptors, Cell SurfaceAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugatesReceptors, Cell SurfaceAntibody drug conjugateInternalizationLinkerRecyclingTrafficking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.