GuidelineDer Nervenarzt2015
[Intensive care therapy of space-occupying large hemispheric infarction. Summary of the NCS/DGNI guidelines].
Guideline in Der Nervenarzt, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality of stroke guidelines in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021Pooled it
- [Focus on neurological intensive care medicine 2024/2025-Summary of selected studies in intensive care medicineal care].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2026Article
- [Focus neurological intensive care medicine 2023/2024 : Summary of selected studies in intensive medical care].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Article
- [Focus on neurological intensive care medicine 2022/2023 : Summary of selected intensive medical care studies].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2023Article
- [Focus neurological intensive care medicine 2021/2022 : Summary of selected intensive care studies].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2022Article
- Sodium ozagrel and atorvastatin for type 2 diabetes patients with lacunar cerebral infarction.World journal of diabetes · 2021Article
- [Intensive care studies from 2017/2018].Der Anaesthesist · 2018Article
- Decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Experience from the Western Province of Saudi Arabia.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2017Article
- [Survey regarding the treatment of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction in German hospitals].Der Nervenarzt · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large hemispheric infarction (LHI), synonymously called malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction, is a severe neurological disease with a high mortality and morbidity. Treating physicians as well as relatives are often faced with few and low quality data when attempting to apply optimal treatment to these patients and make decisions. While current stroke treatment guidelines focus on risk factors, prevention and acute management, they include only limited recommendations concerning intensive care management of LHI. The Neurocritical Care Society (NCS) and the German Society for Neurocritical and Emergency Medicine (DGNI) organized an interdisciplinary consensus conference on intensive care management of LHI to meet this demand. European and American experts in neurology, neurocritical care, neurosurgery, neuroradiology and neuroanesthesiology were selected based on their expertise and research focus. Subgroups for several main topics elaborated a number of central clinical questions concerning this topic and evaluated the quality of the currently available data according to the grading of recommendation assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) guideline system. Subsequently, evidence-based recommendations were compiled after weighing the advantages against the disadvantages of certain management options. This is a commented abridged version of the results of the consensus conference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.