Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26108552›Full record

ReviewItalian journal of pediatrics2015

The great fluid debate: saline or so-called "balanced" salt solutions?

Maristella Santi, Sebastiano A G Lava, Pietro Camozzi, Olivier Giannini, Gregorio P Milani, Giacomo D Simonetti, Emilio F Fossali, Mario G Bianchetti, Pietro B Faré

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Thirst, sodium, and the hospitalized child: rethinking hypernatremia.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Eu- or hypoglycemic ketosis and ketoacidosis in children: a review.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Fluid bolus therapy in pediatric sepsis: a narrative review.European journal of medical research · 2022
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maristella SantiDepartment of Pediatrics, Ospedale San Giovanni, 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Sebastiano A G LavaUniversity Children's Hospital Berne and University of Berne, 3010 Berne, Switzerland.
Pietro CamozziDepartment of Pediatrics, Ospedale San Giovanni, 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Olivier GianniniDivision of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Ospedale Regionale, 6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland.
Gregorio P MilaniPediatric Emergency Department, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Giacomo D SimonettiDepartment of Pediatrics, Ospedale San Giovanni, 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Emilio F FossaliPediatric Emergency Department, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Mario G BianchettiDepartment of Pediatrics, Ospedale San Giovanni, 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland. mario.bianchetti@pediatrician.ch.
Pietro B FaréDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ospedale San Giovanni, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntravenous fluids are commonly prescribed in childhood. 0.9 % saline is the most-used fluid in pediatrics as resuscitation or maintenance solution. Experimental studies and observations in adults suggest that 0.9 % saline is a poor candidate for fluid resuscitation. Although anesthesiologists, intensive care specialists, perioperative physicians and nephrologists have been the most active in this debate, this issue deserves some physiopathological considerations also among pediatricians.

resultsAs compared with so-called "balanced" salt crystalloids such as lactated Ringer, administration of large volumes of 0.9 % saline has been associated with following deleterious effects: tendency to hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis (called dilution acidosis); acute kidney injury with reduced urine output and salt retention; damaged vascular permeability and stiffness, increase in proinflammatory mediators; detrimental effect on coagulation with tendency to blood loss; detrimental gastrointestinal perfusion and function; possible uneasiness at the bedside resulting in unnecessary administration of more fluids. Nevertheless, there is no firm evidence that these adverse effects are clinically relevant.

conclusionsIntravenous fluid therapy is a medicine like insulin, chemotherapy or antibiotics. Prescribing fluids should fit the child's history and condition, consider the right dose at the right rate as well as the electrolyte levels and other laboratory variables. It is unlikely that a single type of fluid will be suitable for all pediatric patients. "Balanced" salt crystalloids, although more expensive, should be preferred for volume resuscitation, maintenance and perioperatively. Lactated Ringer appears unsuitable for patients at risk for brain edema and for those with overt or latent chloride-deficiency. Finally, in pediatrics there is a need for new fluids to be developed on the basis of a better understanding of the physiology and to be tested in well-designed trials.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAnimalsBody FluidsFluid TherapyHumansInfusions, IntravenousSodium ChlorideSodium Chloride

Identifiers

PMID26108552
PMCPMC4479318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.