Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26108479›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2015

The discourses on induced abortion in Ugandan daily newspapers: a discourse analysis.

Sofia Larsson, Miriam Eliasson, Marie Klingberg Allvin, Elisabeth Faxelid, Lynn Atuyambe, Sara Fritzell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Power, policy and abortion care in Uganda.Health policy and planning · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Medical technologies and abortion care in Eastern Uganda.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sofia LarssonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 29, Solna, Sweden. sofia.larsson@rkh.se.
Miriam EliassonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 29, Solna, Sweden. miriam.eliasson@ki.se.
Marie Klingberg AllvinSchool of Health and Social Sciences, Dalarna University, 791 88, Falun, Sweden. mkl@du.se.
Elisabeth FaxelidDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 29, Solna, Sweden. elisabeth.faxelid@ki.se.
Lynn AtuyambeDepartment of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, P.O.Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. atuyambe@musph.ac.ug.
Sara FritzellDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 29, Solna, Sweden. sara.fritzell@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUgandan law prohibits abortion under all circumstances except where there is a risk for the woman's life. However, it has been estimated that over 250 000 illegal abortions are being performed in the country yearly. Many of these abortions are carried out under unsafe conditions, being one of the most common reasons behind the nearly 5000 maternal deaths per year in Uganda. Little research has been conducted in relation to societal views on abortion within the Ugandan society. This study aims to analyze the discourse on abortion as expressed in the two main daily Ugandan newspapers.

methodThe conceptual content of 59 articles on abortion between years 2006-2012, from the two main daily English-speaking newspapers in Uganda, was studied using principles from critical discourse analysis.

resultsA religious discourse and a human rights discourse, together with medical and legal sub discourses frame the subject of abortion in Uganda, with consequences for who is portrayed as a victim and who is to blame for abortions taking place. It shows the strong presence of the Catholic Church within the medial debate on abortion. The results also demonstrate the absence of medial statements related to abortion made by political stakeholders.

conclusionsThe Catholic Church has a strong position within the Ugandan society and their stance on abortion tends to have great influence on the way other actors and their activities are presented within the media, as well as how stakeholders choose to convey their message, or choose not to publicly debate the issue in question at all. To decrease the number of maternal deaths, we highlight the need for a more inclusive and varied debate that problematizes the current situation, especially from a gender perspective.

Indexed as

AttitudeCatholicismAbortion, IllegalAbortion, InducedAbortion, LegalFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHuman RightsHumansMaternal DeathMoralsNewspapers as TopicPregnancyUganda

Identifiers

PMID26108479
PMCPMC4481262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.