Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26108469›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Molecular and neuronal homology between the olfactory systems of zebrafish and mouse.

Luis R Saraiva, Gaurav Ahuja, Ivan Ivandic, Adnan S Syed, John C Marioni, Sigrun I Korsching, Darren W Logan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Structural Regeneration and Functional Recovery of the Olfactory System of Adult Zebrafish Following Brain Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Biochemical characterization of zebrafish Paqr5b.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Luis R Saraiva1] Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton-Cambridge, CB10 1SA, United Kingdom [2] European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton-Cambridge, CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.
Gaurav AhujaInstitut für Genetik, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, 50674, Germany.
Ivan IvandicInstitut für Genetik, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, 50674, Germany.
Adnan S SyedInstitut für Genetik, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, 50674, Germany.
John C MarioniEuropean Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton-Cambridge, CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.
Sigrun I KorschingInstitut für Genetik, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, 50674, Germany.
Darren W LoganWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton-Cambridge, CB10 1SA, United Kingdom.
University of Cologne · DEWellcome Sanger Institute · GBWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of the two major olfactory organs of rodents, the olfactory mucosa (OM) and the vomeronasal organ (VNO), unraveled the molecular basis of smell in vertebrates. However, some vertebrates lack a VNO. Here we generated and analyzed the olfactory transcriptome of the zebrafish and compared it to the olfactory transcriptomes of mouse to investigate the evolutionary and molecular relationship between single and dual olfactory systems. Our analyses revealed a high degree of molecular conservation, with orthologs of mouse olfactory cell-specific markers and all but one of their chemosensory receptor classes expressed in the single zebrafish olfactory organ. Zebrafish chemosensory receptor genes are expressed across a large dynamic range and their RNA abundance correlates positively with the number of neurons expressing that RNA. Thus we estimate the relative proportions of neuronal sub-types expressing different chemosensory receptors. Receptor repertoire size drives the absolute abundance of different classes of neurons, but we find similar underlying patterns in both species. Finally, we identified novel marker genes that characterize rare neuronal populations in both mouse and zebrafish. In sum, we find that the molecular and cellular mechanisms underpinning olfaction in teleosts and mammals are similar despite 430 million years of evolutionary divergence.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionBrainCluster AnalysisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleMiceOlfactory MucosaOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPhylogenyReceptors, Formyl PeptideReceptors, OdorantReceptors, ProgesteroneRNASequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeReceptors, Formyl PeptideReceptors, OdorantReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA

Identifiers

PMID26108469
PMCPMC4480006
OpenAlexW2271547107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.