Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26108372›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

Caenorhabditis elegans is a useful model for anthelmintic discovery.

Andrew R Burns, Genna M Luciani, Gabriel Musso, Rachel Bagg, May Yeo, Yuqian Zhang, Luckshi Rajendran, John Glavin, Robert Hunter, Elizabeth Redman and 12 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 114 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Environmental science. Processes & impacts · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Synthesis, Anthelmintic Activity, and Mechanism of Action of 5-Aryl-1Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Advances in Anthelmintic Target Identification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Andrew R BurnsThe Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E1.
Genna M LucianiThe Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E1.
Gabriel MussoCardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Rachel BaggThe Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E1.
May YeoThe Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E1.
Yuqian ZhangThe Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E1.
Luckshi RajendranThe Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E1.
John GlavinThe Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E1.
Robert HunterThe Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E1.
Elizabeth RedmanDepartment of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4Z6.
Susan StasiukDepartment of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4Z6.
Michael SchertzbergThe Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E1.
G Angus McQuibbanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A8.
Conor R CaffreyCenter for Discovery and Innovation in Parasitic Diseases and Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.
Sean R CutlerCenter for Plant Cell Biology, Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA.
Mike TyersInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3T 1J4.
Guri GiaeverDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3.
Corey NislowDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3.
Andy G FraserThe Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E1.
Calum A MacRaeCardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
John GilleardDepartment of Comparative Biology and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4Z6.
Peter J RoyThe Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3E1.

Funding

Validating promising drug candidates in mammalian models of CN poisoningU54NS079201 · NINDS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI PETERSON, RANDALL T, PETERSON, RAYMOND J · 2012 to 2016
$12.6M
Functional evaluation of GWAS loci for cardiovascular intermediate phenotypesR21HL098938 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MACRAE, CALUM A. · 2009 to 2010
$1.1M
CIHR 230927CIHR 313296CIHR 488367NHLBI NIH HHS HL098938NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL098938NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS079201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasitic nematodes infect one quarter of the world's population and impact all humans through widespread infection of crops and livestock. Resistance to current anthelmintics has prompted the search for new drugs. Traditional screens that rely on parasitic worms are costly and labour intensive and target-based approaches have failed to yield novel anthelmintics. Here, we present our screen of 67,012 compounds to identify those that kill the non-parasitic nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. We then rescreen our hits in two parasitic nematode species and two vertebrate models (HEK293 cells and zebrafish), and identify 30 structurally distinct anthelmintic lead molecules. Genetic screens of 19 million C. elegans mutants reveal those nematicides for which the generation of resistance is and is not likely. We identify the target of one lead with nematode specificity and nanomolar potency as complex II of the electron transport chain. This work establishes C. elegans as an effective and cost-efficient model system for anthelmintic discovery.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthelminticsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDrug ResistanceElectron Transport Complex IIHEK293 CellsHumansModels, MolecularMolecular StructurePhylogenyProtein ConformationSpecies SpecificityStructure-Activity RelationshipZebrafishAnthelminticsCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsElectron Transport Complex II

Identifiers

PMID26108372
PMCPMC4491176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.