Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26108366›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2016

Modification over time of pulse wave velocity parallel to changes in aortic BP, as well as in 24-h ambulatory brachial BP.

A Oliveras, J Segura, C Suarez, L García-Ortiz, M Abad-Cardiel, L Vigil, M A Gómez-Marcos, L Sans Atxer, N Martell-Claros, L M Ruilope and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

A OliverasHypertension Unit, Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
J SeguraHypertension Unit, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4677-9526
C SuarezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
L García-OrtizHealth Center La Alamedilla, IBSAL (Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain.
M Abad-CardielHypertension Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
L VigilHospital de Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
M A Gómez-MarcosHealth Center La Alamedilla, IBSAL (Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain.
L Sans AtxerHypertension Unit, Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
N Martell-ClarosHypertension Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
L M RuilopeHypertension Unit, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
A de la SierraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Mútua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
PRESCEN Study

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arterial stiffness as assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) is a marker of preclinical organ damage and a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes, independently of blood pressure (BP). However, limited evidence exists on the association between long-term variation (Δ) on aortic BP (aoBP) and ΔcfPWV. We aimed to evaluate the relationship of ΔBP with ΔcfPWV over time, as assessed by office and 24-h ambulatory peripheral BP, and aoBP. AoBP and cfPWV were evaluated in 209 hypertensive patients with either diabetes or metabolic syndrome by applanation tonometry (Sphygmocor) at baseline(b) and at 12 months of follow-up(fu). Peripheral BP was also determined by using validated oscillometric devices (office(o)-BP) and on an outpatient basis by using a validated (Spacelabs-90207) device (24-h ambulatory BP). ΔcfPWV over time was calculated as follows: ΔcfPWV=[(cfPWVfu-cfPWVb)/cfPWVb] × 100. ΔBP over time resulted from the same formula applied to BP values obtained with the three different measurement techniques. Correlations (Spearman 'Rho') between ΔBP and ΔcfPWV were calculated. Mean age was 62 years, 39% were female and 80% had type 2 diabetes. Baseline office brachial BP (mm Hg) was 143±20/82±12. Follow-up (12 months later) office brachial BP (mm Hg) was 136±20/79±12. ΔcfPWV correlated with ΔoSBP (Rho=0.212; P=0.002), Δ24-h SBP (Rho=0.254; P<0.001), Δdaytime SBP (Rho=0.232; P=0.001), Δnighttime SBP (Rho=0.320; P<0.001) and ΔaoSBP (Rho=0.320; P<0.001). A multiple linear regression analysis included the following independent variables: ΔoSBP, Δ24-h SBP, Δdaytime SBP, Δnighttime SBP and ΔaoSBP. ΔcfPWV was independently associated with Δ24-h SBP (β-coefficient=0.195; P=0.012) and ΔaoSBP (β-coefficient= 0.185; P=0.018). We conclude that changes in both 24-h SBP and aoSBP more accurately reflect changes in arterial stiffness than do office BP measurements.

Indexed as

Arterial PressurePulse Wave AnalysisAgedBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedVascular Stiffness

Identifiers

PMID26108366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.