ArticleScientific reports2015
Phytotoxic Mechanism of Nanoparticles: Destruction of Chloroplasts and Vascular Bundles and Alteration of Nutrient Absorption.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 188 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanotechnology-driven biofortification of Fe, Zn, and Se in edible plants.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Uptake, Translocation, Toxicity, and Impact of Nanoparticles on Plant Physiological Processes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Phytogenic nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and their roles in physiology and biochemistry of plants.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2024Review
- Unlocking the Potential of Nano-Enabled Precision Agriculture for Efficient and Sustainable Farming.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- The Effect of Functionalized Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes with Fe and Mn Oxides onPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Impact of Foliar Application of ZnO and FePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Nano-enabled agriculture: How do nanoparticles cross barriers in plants?Plant communications · 2022Review
- Role of metal-nanoparticles in farming practices: an insight.3 Biotech · 2022Review
- Manufactured Nano-Objects Confer Viral Protection against Cucurbit Chlorotic Yellows Virus (CCYV) InfectingMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- CeOGlobal challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2022Article
- Phytotoxic effect of sub-3-nm crystalline ceria nanoparticles on the hydroponic growth of Daikon radish microgreens.ChemNanoMat : chemistry of nanomaterials for energy, biology and more · 2022Article
- Recent Trends in Nano-Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture under Climate Change for Global Food Security.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Switching to nanonutrients for sustaining agroecosystems and environment: the challenges and benefits in moving up from ionic to particle feeding.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
- Different physiological responses of C3 and C4 plants to nanomaterials.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Metal Homeostasis and Gas Exchange Dynamics inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Advances in nanomaterials as novel elicitors of pharmacologically active plant specialized metabolites: current status and future outlooks.RSC advances · 2019Review
- Responses of seed germination and shoot metabolic profiles of maize (RSC advances · 2019Article
- Foliar Application of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Zinc Sulfate Boosts the Content of Bioactive Compounds in Habanero Peppers.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Carbon and nitrogen partitioning of transgenic rice T2A-1 (Cry2A*) with different nitrogen treatments.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study focused on determining the phytotoxic mechanism of CeO2 nanoparticles (NPs): destroying chloroplasts and vascular bundles and altering absorption of nutrients on conventional and Bt-transgenic cottons. Experiments were designed with three concentrations of CeO2 NPs including: 0, 100 and 500 mg·L(-1), and each treatment was three replications. Results indicate that absorbed CeO2 nanoparticles significantly reduced the Zn, Mg, Fe, and P levels in xylem sap compared with the control group and decreased indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and abscisic acid (ABA) concentrations in the roots of conventional cotton. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images revealed that CeO2 NPs were absorbed into the roots and subsequently transported to the stems and leaves of both conventional and Bt-transgenic cotton plants via xylem sap. In addition, the majority of aggregated CeO2 NPs were attached to the external surface of chloroplasts, which were swollen and ruptured, especially in Bt-transgenic cotton. The vascular bundles were destroyed by CeO2 nanoparticles, and more damage was observed in transgenic cotton than conventional cotton.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.