ReviewAllergy and asthma proceedings
Bronchial thermoplasty: Where there is smoke, there is fire.
Review in Allergy and asthma proceedings. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Rebuttal Comments from Dr. Dunn and Dr. Wechsler.Allergy and asthma proceedingsArticle
- The Saudi Initiative for Asthma - 2016 update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children.Annals of thoracic medicineArticle
- Addressing the challenges of severe asthma.Allergy and asthma proceedingsArticle
- The Saudi Initiative for Asthma - 2019 Update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children.Annals of thoracic medicineArticle
- The Saudi Initiative for Asthma - 2021 Update: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in adults and children.Annals of thoracic medicineArticle
- Bronchial thermoplasty-an update.Annals of thoracic medicineReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is the first nonpharmacologic interventional therapy approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2010 for severe asthma. This approval was based on randomized sham-controlled trial called Asthma Intervention Research (AIR) 2 published in 2010. BT involves the application of radiofrequency energy to airways with an aim to selectively ablate airway smooth muscle. BT is currently marketed for patients with "severe" asthma. Most practicing clinicians apply this severity category to patients with oral corticosteroid dependence, frequent exacerbations, or a significantly reduced forced expiratory volume in 1 second along with a poor quality of life. Did the patients studied in the AIR-2 trial have these clinical features? Was there a reduction in severe asthma exacerbation achieved in the intervention group? Did any of the primary or secondary end points in the AIR-2 trial show a positive signal? There continues to be controversy regarding patient selection and primary outcome. Its efficacy in the management of the patient with difficult-to-manage asthma is uncertain. This review covered pertinent aspects of BT, the design and results of the AIR-2 trial, and provides the practicing allergist with a comprehensive overview of this therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26108081What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.