ArticlePlant signaling & behavior2015
Subgroup-specific intrinsic disorder profiles of Arabidopsis NAC transcription factors: Identification of functional hotspots.
Article in Plant signaling & behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchy in regulator interactions with distant transcriptional activation domains empowers rheostatic regulation.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Article
- Intrinsic Disorder in Plant Transcription Factor Systems: Functional Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- IDDomainSpotter: Compositional bias reveals domains in long disordered protein regions-Insights from transcription factors.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020Article
- Interactions by Disorder - A Matter of Context.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Review
- Evolutionary conservation of the intrinsic disorder-based Radical-Induced Cell Death1 hub interactome.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Does water stress promote the proteome-wide adjustment of intrinsically disordered proteins in plants?Cell stress & chaperones · 2018Article
- Article
- Evolution of intrinsic disorder in eukaryotic proteins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017Review
- Structures and Short Linear Motif of Disordered Transcription Factor Regions Provide Clues to the Interactome of the Cellular Hub Protein Radical-induced Cell Death1.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2017Article
- SeqEnrich: A tool to predict transcription factor networks from co-expressed Arabidopsis and Brassica napus gene sets.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein intrinsic disorder (ID), referring to the lack of a fixed tertiary structure, is significant in signaling and transcription. We recently characterized ID in 6 phylogenetically representative Arabidopsis thaliana NAC transcription factors. Their transcription regulatory domains are mostly disordered but contain short, functionally important regions with structure propensities known as molecular recognition features. Here, we analyze for NAC subgroup-specific ID patterns. Some subgroups, such as the VND subgroup implicated in secondary cell wall biosynthesis, and the NAP/SHYG subgroup have highly conserved ID profiles. For the stress-associated ATAF1 subgroup and the CUC/ORE1 subgroup involved in development, only sub clades have similar ID patterns. For similar ID profiles, conserved molecular recognition features and sequence motifs represent likely functional determinants of e.g. transcriptional activation and interactions. Based on our analysis, we suggest that ID profiling of regulatory proteins in general can be used to guide identification of interaction partners of network proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.