Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26107813›Full record

Observational studyArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2015

Cardiac surgery costs according to the preoperative risk in the Brazilian public health system.

David Provenzale Titinger, Luiz Augusto Ferreira Lisboa, Bruna La Regina Matrangolo, Luis Roberto Palma Dallan, Luis Alberto Oliveira Dallan, Evelinda Marramon Trindade, Ivone Eckl, Roberto Kalil Filho, Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejía, Fabio Biscegli Jatene

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David Provenzale TitingerHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR.
Luiz Augusto Ferreira LisboaHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR.
Bruna La Regina MatrangoloHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR.
Luis Roberto Palma DallanHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR.
Luis Alberto Oliveira DallanHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR.
Evelinda Marramon TrindadeHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR.
Ivone EcklHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR.
Roberto Kalil FilhoHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR.
Omar Asdrúbal Vilca MejíaHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR.
Fabio Biscegli JateneHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart surgery has developed with increasing patient complexity.

objectiveTo assess the use of resources and real costs stratified by risk factors of patients submitted to surgical cardiac procedures and to compare them with the values reimbursed by the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).

methodAll cardiac surgery procedures performed between January and July 2013 in a tertiary referral center were analyzed. Demographic and clinical data allowed the calculation of the value reimbursed by the Brazilian SUS. Patients were stratified as low, intermediate and high-risk categories according to the EuroSCORE. Clinical outcomes, use of resources and costs (real costs versus SUS) were compared between established risk groups.

resultsPostoperative mortality rates of low, intermediate and high-risk EuroSCORE risk strata showed a significant linear positive correlation (EuroSCORE: 3.8%, 10%, and 25%; p < 0.0001), as well as occurrence of any postoperative complication EuroSCORE: 13.7%, 20.7%, and 30.8%, respectively; p = 0.006). Accordingly, length-of-stay increased from 20.9 days to 24.8 and 29.2 days (p < 0.001). The real cost was parallel to increased resource use according to EuroSCORE risk strata (R$ 27.116,00 ± R$ 13.928,00 versus R$ 34.854,00 ± R$ 27.814,00 versus R$ 43.234,00 ± R$ 26.009,00, respectively; p < 0.001). SUS reimbursement also increased (R$ 14.306,00 ± R$ 4.571,00 versus R$ 16.217,00 ± R$ 7.298,00 versus R$ 19.548,00 ± R$935,00; p < 0.001). However, as the EuroSCORE increased, there was significant difference (p < 0.0001) between the real cost increasing slope and the SUS reimbursement elevation per EuroSCORE risk strata.

conclusionHigher EuroSCORE was related to higher postoperative mortality, complications, length of stay, and costs. Although SUS reimbursement increased according to risk, it was not proportional to real costs.

Indexed as

Preoperative PeriodAgedBrazilCardiac Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesReference ValuesReimbursement MechanismsRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID26107813
PMCPMC4559121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.