Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26107522›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

The dose-dependent effect of nesiritide on renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Bo Xiong, Chunbin Wang, Yuanqing Yao, Yuwen Huang, Jie Tan, Yin Cao, Yanke Zou, Jing Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in nephrology · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bo XiongDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chunbin WangDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yuanqing YaoDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yuwen HuangDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jie TanDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yin CaoDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yanke ZouDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jing HuangDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNDalian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConflicting renal effects of nesiritide have been reported in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. To answer this controversy, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the influence of nesiritide on renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

methodsArticles were obtained from PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library and reference review. Randomized controlled studies that investigated the effects of continuous infusion of nesiritide on renal function in adult patients with acute decompensated heart failure were included and analyzed. Fixed-effect model was used to estimate relative risk (RR) and weight mean difference (WMD). The quality assessment of each study, subgroup, sensitivity, and publication bias analyses were performed.

resultsFifteen randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. Most of included studies had relatively high quality and no publication bias was found. Overall, compared to control therapies, nesiritide might increase the risk of worsening renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15, P = 0.023). In subgroup analysis, high-dose nesiritide strongly associated with renal dysfunction (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.19-2.00, P = 0.001), but no statistical differences were observed in standard-dose (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.98-1.12, P = 0.213), low-dose groups (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.74-1.37, P = 0.968) and same results were identified in the subgroup analysis of placebo controlled trials. Peak mean change of serum creatinine from baseline was no significant difference (WMD -2.54, 95% CI -5.76-0.67, P = 0.121).

conclusionsIn our meta-analysis, nesiritide may have a dose-dependent effect on renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. High-dose nesiritide is likely to increase the risk of worsening renal function, but standard-dose and low-dose nesiritide probably have no impact on renal function. These findings could be helpful to optimize the use of nesiritide in clinical practice.

Indexed as

CreatinineDose-Response Relationship, DrugHeart FailureHumansKidneyKidney Function TestsModels, StatisticalNatriuretic AgentsNatriuretic Peptide, BrainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRenal InsufficiencyRiskCreatinineNatriuretic AgentsNatriuretic Peptide, Brain

Identifiers

PMID26107522
PMCPMC4479574
OpenAlexW2338264498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.