Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26107498›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

An Interspecies Comparative Analysis of the Predicted Secretomes of the Necrotrophic Plant Pathogens Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea.

Steph Heard, Neil A Brown, Kim Hammond-Kosack

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-Wide Identification of CFEM Proteins inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CgCFEM1 Is Required for the Full Virulence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Cells · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Effector Protein CgNLP1 ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tackling Control of a Cosmopolitan Phytopathogen:Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Review
  16. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Host Transcriptional Response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steph HeardPlant Biology and Crop Science, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Neil A BrownPlant Biology and Crop Science, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Kim Hammond-KosackPlant Biology and Crop Science, Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Rothamsted Research · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I000488/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/B/12261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytopathogenic fungi form intimate associations with host plant species and cause disease. To be successful, fungal pathogens communicate with a susceptible host through the secretion of proteinaceous effectors, hydrolytic enzymes and metabolites. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea are economically important necrotrophic fungal pathogens that cause disease on numerous crop species. Here, a powerful bioinformatics pipeline was used to predict the refined S. sclerotiorum and B. cinerea secretomes, identifying 432 and 499 proteins respectively. Analyses focusing on S. sclerotiorum revealed that 16% of the secretome encoding genes resided in small, sequence heterogeneous, gene clusters that were distributed over 13 of the 16 predicted chromosomes. Functional analyses highlighted the importance of plant cell hydrolysis, oxidation-reduction processes and the redox state to the S. sclerotiorum and B. cinerea secretomes and potentially host infection. Only 8% of the predicted proteins were distinct between the two secretomes. In contrast to S. sclerotiorum, the B. cinerea secretome lacked CFEM- or LysM-containing proteins. The 115 fungal and oomycete genome comparison identified 30 proteins specific to S. sclerotiorum and B. cinerea, plus 11 proteins specific to S. sclerotiorum and 32 proteins specific to B. cinerea. Expressed sequence tag (EST) and proteomic analyses showed that 246 S. sclerotiorum secretome encoding genes had EST support, including 101 which were only expressed in vitro and 49 which were only expressed in planta, whilst 42 predicted proteins were experimentally proven to be secreted. These detailed in silico analyses of two important necrotrophic pathogens will permit informed choices to be made when candidate effector proteins are selected for function analyses in planta.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, FungalGene Expression Regulation, FungalAscomycotaBotrytisChromosome MappingComputational BiologyExpressed Sequence TagsFungal ProteinsHost-Pathogen InteractionsMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultigene FamilyPlantsProteomicsSpecies SpecificityFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26107498
PMCPMC4480369
OpenAlexW2283073108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.