Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26107049›Full record

ArticleBrain connectivity2015

Using Edge Voxel Information to Improve Motion Regression for rs-fMRI Connectivity Studies.

Rémi Patriat, Erin K Molloy, Rasmus M Birn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain connectivity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Head motion: the dirty little secret of neuroimaging in psychiatryJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2019
    Article
  13. Resting State fMRI: Going Through the Motions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rémi Patriat1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin.
Erin K Molloy2 Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin.
Rasmus M Birn1 Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin.

Funding

Summer Research ExperienceP50MH100031 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GOLDSMITH, HAROLD HILL · 2013 to 2017
$10.4M
Validating Resting State fMRI Derived Brain ConnectivityRC1MH090912 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MEYERAND, MARY E. · 2009 to 2010
$999k
Correcting Motion and Physiological Noise: key barriers in resting state fMRIR21MH101526 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BIRN, RASMUS MATTHIAS · 2014 to 2015
$406k
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH100031NIMH NIH HHS P50MH100031NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH101526NIMH NIH HHS R21MH101526NIMH NIH HHS RC1MH090912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent fMRI studies have outlined the critical impact of in-scanner head motion, particularly on estimates of functional connectivity. Common strategies to reduce the influence of motion include realignment as well as the inclusion of nuisance regressors, such as the 6 realignment parameters, their first derivatives, time-shifted versions of the realignment parameters, and the squared parameters. However, these regressors have limited success at noise reduction. We hypothesized that using nuisance regressors consisting of the principal components (PCs) of edge voxel time series would be better able to capture slice-specific and nonlinear signal changes, thus explaining more variance, improving data quality (i.e., lower DVARS and temporal SNR), and reducing the effect of motion on default-mode network connectivity. Functional MRI data from 22 healthy adult subjects were preprocessed using typical motion regression approaches as well as nuisance regression derived from edge voxel time courses. Results were evaluated in the presence and absence of both global signal regression and motion censoring. Nuisance regressors derived from signal intensity time courses at the edge of the brain significantly improved motion correction compared to using only the realignment parameters and their derivatives. Of the models tested, only the edge voxel regression models were able to eliminate significant differences in default-mode network connectivity between high- and low-motion subjects regardless of the use of global signal regression or censoring.

Indexed as

AdultArtifactsBrainBrain MappingConnectomeFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotionconnectivityedge voxelsmotion correctionresting-state

Identifiers

PMID26107049
PMCPMC4652211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.