ArticlePloS one2015
The relationship between cranial structure, biomechanical performance and ecological diversity in varanoid lizards.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morphological disparity and structural performance of the dromaeosaurid skull informs ecology and evolutionary history.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Cranial functional specialisation for strength precedes morphological evolution in Oviraptorosauria.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Food transport in Reptilia: a comparative viewpoint.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Macroanatomical, Histological and Microtomographic Study of the Teeth of the Komodo Dragon (Biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Many-to-one function of cat-like mandibles highlights a continuum of sabre-tooth adaptations.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- The ecological diversification and evolution of Teleosauroidea (Crocodylomorpha, Thalattosuchia), with insights into their mandibular biomechanics.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Taking a stab at modelling canine tooth biomechanics in mammalian carnivores with beam theory and finite-element analysis.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- A new stem-varanid lizard (Reptilia, Squamata) from the early Eocene of China.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Comparative cranial biomechanics in two lizard species: impact of variation in cranial design.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021Article
- Dental microwear texture analysis along reptile tooth rows: complex variation with non-dietary variables.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- The Intertwined Evolution and Development of Sutures and Cranial Morphology.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Dietary differences in archosaur and lepidosaur reptiles revealed by dental microwear textural analysis.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The biomechanical role of the chondrocranium and sutures in a lizard cranium.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017Article
- Ecological allometries and niche use dynamics across Komodo dragon ontogeny.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skull structure is intimately associated with feeding ability in vertebrates, both in terms of specific performance measures and general ecological characteristics. This study quantitatively assessed variation in the shape of the cranium and mandible in varanoid lizards, and its relationship to structural performance (von Mises strain) and interspecific differences in feeding ecology. Geometric morphometric and linear morphometric analyses were used to evaluate morphological differences, and finite element analysis was used to quantify variation in structural performance (strain during simulated biting, shaking and pulling). This data was then integrated with ecological classes compiled from relevant scientific literature on each species in order to establish structure-function relationships. Finite element modelling results showed that variation in cranial morphology resulted in large differences in the magnitudes and locations of strain in biting, shaking and pulling load cases. Gracile species such as Varanus salvadorii displayed high strain levels during shaking, especially in the areas between the orbits. All models exhibit less strain during pull back loading compared to shake loading, even though a larger force was applied (pull =30N, shake = 20N). Relationships were identified between the morphology, performance, and ecology. Species that did not feed on hard prey clustered in the gracile region of cranial morphospace and exhibited significantly higher levels of strain during biting (P = 0.0106). Species that fed on large prey clustered in the elongate area of mandible morphospace. This relationship differs from those that have been identified in other taxonomic groups such as crocodiles and mammals. This difference may be due to a combination of the open 'space-frame' structure of the varanoid lizard skull, and the 'pull back' behaviour that some species use for processing large prey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.