Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26106566›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2015

Contrasting brain patterns of writing-related DTI parameters, fMRI connectivity, and DTI-fMRI connectivity correlations in children with and without dysgraphia or dyslexia.

T L Richards, T J Grabowski, P Boord, K Yagle, M Askren, Z Mestre, P Robinson, O Welker, D Gulliford, W Nagy and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Atypical structural connectivity of language networks in autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The Modularity of Dysgraphia.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The Self in Self-Regulated Writing of Fourth to Ninth Graders with Dysgraphia.International journal of school & educational psychology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

T L RichardsIntegrated Brain Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
T J GrabowskiIntegrated Brain Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
P BoordIntegrated Brain Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
K YagleIntegrated Brain Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
M AskrenIntegrated Brain Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Z MestreIntegrated Brain Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
P RobinsonIntegrated Brain Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
O WelkerIntegrated Brain Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
D GullifordIntegrated Brain Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
W NagyDepartment of Education, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, USA.
V BerningerDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Imaging Center · USUniversity of Washington · USSeattle University · USSeattle Pacific University · US

Funding

Services Core P50HD071764 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ABBOTT, ROBERT D · 2012 to 2016
$8.0M
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GURALNICK, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD071764NICHD NIH HHS P50HD071764NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on comprehensive testing and educational history, children in grades 4-9 (on average 12 years) were diagnosed with dysgraphia (persisting handwriting impairment) or dyslexia (persisting word spelling/reading impairment) or as typical writers and readers (controls). The dysgraphia group (n = 14) and dyslexia group (n = 17) were each compared to the control group (n = 9) and to each other in separate analyses. Four brain region seed points (left occipital temporal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, precuneus, and inferior frontal gyrus) were used in these analyses which were shown in a metaanalysis to be related to written word production on four indicators of white matter integrity and fMRI functional connectivity for four tasks (self-guided mind wandering during resting state, writing letter that follows a visually displayed letter in alphabet, writing missing letter to create a correctly spelled real word, and planning for composing after scanning on topic specified by researcher). For those DTI indicators on which the dysgraphic group or dyslexic group differed from the control group (fractional anisotropy, relative anisotropy, axial diffusivity but not radial diffusivity), correlations were computed between the DTI parameter and fMRI functional connectivity for the two writing tasks (alphabet and spelling) by seed points. Analyses, controlled for multiple comparisons, showed that (a) the control group exhibited more white matter integrity than either the dysgraphic or dyslexic group; (b) the dysgraphic and dyslexic groups showed more functional connectivity than the control group but differed in patterns of functional connectivity for task and seed point; and (c) the dysgraphic and dyslexic groups showed different patterns of significant DTI-fMRI connectivity correlations for specific seed points and written language tasks. Thus, dysgraphia and dyslexia differ in white matter integrity, fMRI functional connectivity, and white matter-gray matter correlations. Of clinical relevance, brain differences were observed in dysgraphia and dyslexia on written language tasks yoked to their defining behavioral impairments in handwriting and/or in word spelling and on the cognitive mind wandering rest condition and composition planning.

Indexed as

ConnectomeAdolescentAgraphiaChildDiffusion Tensor ImagingDyslexiaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleWhite MatterWritingConnectivityDTIDysgraphiaDyslexiafMRI

Identifiers

PMID26106566
PMCPMC4473717
OpenAlexW2050307652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.