Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26106564›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2015

Differentiating SCT and inattentive symptoms in ADHD using fMRI measures of cognitive control.

Catherine Fassbender, Cynthia E Krafft, Julie B Schweitzer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Investigating the Shared and Divergent Neuroanatomical Features of Attentional Deficits in Adolescents.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cognitive disengagement syndrome in pediatric spina bifida.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2024
    Article
  8. Neurocognition in children with cognitive disengagement syndrome: accurate but slow.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and Neuropsychological Functioning.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine FassbenderUniversity of California Davis MIND Institute, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Cynthia E KrafftUniversity of California Davis MIND Institute, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Julie B SchweitzerUniversity of California Davis MIND Institute, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
University of California Davis Medical Center · US

Funding

Developmental Changes in Neural Processes Underlying Inattention, Impulsivity and RegulationR01MH091068 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SCHWEITZER, JULIE B. · 2012 to 2022
$7.4M
A Compensatory Functional Neuroanatomy of ADHDR01MH066310 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SCHWEITZER, JULIE B. · 2004 to 2007
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS 5 R01 MH066310NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066310NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is associated with different impairment profiles in the symptom domains of hyperactivity/impulsivity and/or inattention. An additional symptom domain of sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) has also been proposed. Although there is a degree of correlation between the SCT symptom domain and inattention, it has been proposed as a distinct disorder independent of ADHD. The objective of this study was to examine the neural substrates of cue-related preparatory processes associated with SCT symptoms versus inattentive symptoms in a group of adolescents with ADHD. We also compared cue-related effects in the entire ADHD group compared with a group of typically developing (TD) peers. A modified cued flanker paradigm and fMRI examined brain activity associated with attention preparation and motor response preparation. Between group contrasts between the ADHD and TD group revealed significant hypoactivity in the ADHD group during general attention preparation in the supplementary motor area (SMA) and in the right superior parietal lobe (SPL) during response preparation. In the ADHD group, greater numbers of SCT symptoms were associated with hypoactivity in the left SPL to cues in general whereas greater numbers of inattentive symptoms were associated with greater activity in the SMA to cues that provided no information and less activity in the thalamus during response preparation. Hypoactivity in the SPL with increasing SCT symptoms may be associated with impaired reorienting or shifting of attention. Altered activity in the SMA and thalamus with increasing inattention may be associated with a general problem with response preparation, which may also reflect inefficient processing of the response preparation cue. Our results support a degree of differentiation between SCT and inattentive symptom profiles within adolescents with ADHD.

Indexed as

AdolescentAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePsychomotor PerformanceADHDAdolescentCognitive controlfMRISluggish cognitive tempo

Identifiers

PMID26106564
PMCPMC4474281
OpenAlexW801582613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.