Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26106468›Full record

ArticleMiddle East journal of digestive diseases2015

Clarithromycin vs. Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapy Regimens for Empiric Primary Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mohsen Masoodi, Mahshid Talebi-Taher, Khadijeh Tabatabaie, Siamak Khaleghi, Amir-Hossein Faghihi, Shahram Agah, Reyhaneh Asadi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Middle East journal of digestive diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fourth-generation quinolones in the treatment ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Eradication ofMiddle East journal of digestive diseases · 2018
    Review
  4. Clarithromycin versus Gemifloxacin in Quadruple Therapeutic Regimens forMiddle East journal of digestive diseases · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohsen MasoodiAssociate professor, Colorectal Research Center, Rasoul-e-Akram General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahshid Talebi-TaherAssociate professor, Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, Infectious Diseases Department, Rasoul-e-Akram General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Khadijeh TabatabaieResearcher, Rasoul-e-Akram General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Siamak KhaleghiAssistant professor, Colorectal Research Center, Rasoul-e-Akram General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir-Hossein FaghihiAssociate professor, Colorectal Research Center, Rasoul-e-Akram General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shahram AgahAssociate professor, Colorectal Research Center, Rasoul-e-Akram General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reyhaneh AsadiResearcher, Rasoul-e-Akram General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Rasool Akram Hospital · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection plays a crucial role in the treatment of peptic ulcer. Clarithromycin resistance is a major cause of treatment failure. This randomized clinical trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a clarithromycin versus gemifloxacin containing quadruple therapy regimen in eradication of H.pylori infection. METHODS In this randomized double blind clinical trial (RCT 2012102011054N2), a total of 120 patients were randomized to two groups of 60 patients each. Patients with proven H.pylori infection were consecutively assigned into two groups to receive OBAG or OBAC in gastroenterology clinic in Rasoul-e- Akram General Hospital in Tehran, Iran. The patients in the OBAG group received omeprazole (20 mg) twice daily, bismuth subcitrate (240 mg) twice daily, amoxicillin (1 gr) twice daily, and gemifloxacin (320 mg) once daily, and those in the OBAC group received omeprazole (20 mg) twice daily, 240 mg of bismuth subcitrate twice daily, amoxicillin (1 gr) twice daily, and clarithromycin (500 mg) twice daily for 10 days. RESULTS Five patients from each group were excluded from the study because of poor compliance, so 110 patients completed the study. The intention-to-treat eradication rate was 61.6% and 66.6% for the OBAC and OBAG groups, respectively. According to the per protocol analysis, the success rates of eradication of H.pylori infection were 67.2% and 72.7% for OBAC and OBAG groups, respectively (p=0.568). CONCLUSION The results of this study suggest that gemifloxacin containing regimen is at least as effective as clarithromycin regimen; hence, this new treatment could be considered as an alternative for the patients who cannot tolerate clarithromycin.

Indexed as

ClarithromycinGemifloxacinH.pyloriIran

Identifiers

PMID26106468
PMCPMC4430797
OpenAlexW2143133745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.