ArticleMiddle East journal of digestive diseases2015
Efficacy of Clarithromycin Containing Bismuth-Based Regimen as a Second-Line Therapy in Helicobacter Pylori Eradication.
Article in Middle East journal of digestive diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparative study of the effect of 10-day esomeprazole containing levofloxacin versus clarithromycin sequential regimens on the treatment of Iranian patients withIndian journal of pharmacologyTrial
- Improving Helicobacter pylori Treatment Standards: A Quality Improvement Project Against Maastricht VI Guidelines.Cureus · 2025Article
- Characterization of clarithromycin heteroresistance among Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from the antrum and corpus of the stomach.Folia microbiologica · 2019Article
- Levofloxacin-containing triple therapy versus bismuth-based quadruple therapy as regimens for second line anti- Helicobacter pylori.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection, commonly prevailing in the stomach, has been important since its introduction. Adequate preparations should be made in finding alternatives when faced with first-line treatment failures. Currently, ideal second-line treatments are indistinct and varied among countries as result of different antibiotic resistance patterns. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a clarithromycin-containing bismuth-based quadruple regimen as a second-line treatment. METHODS Forty-eight H.pylori-positive patients with proven gastric or duodenal ulcers and/or erosions who had previously failed to respond to furazolidone-containing regimens were enrolled. They received pantoprazole (40 mg-bid), amoxicillin (1gr-bid), bismuth subcitrate (240 mg-bid), and clarithromycin (500mg-bid) for 10 days. Eight weeks after treatment, a (14)C-urea breath test was performed for the re-evaluation of H. pylori eradication. RESULTS Forty-three patients completed the study. H.pylori eradication rates were 79.2% (95% CI=65.00-89.53) and 88.4% (95% CI=74.91-96.11) according to intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively. All patients had excellent compliance to treatment and one did not continue therapy because of adverse effects. CONCLUSION In developing countries such as Iran, a ten-day clarithromycin-containing bismuth-based quadruple regimen is encouraged as a second-line treatment because of the acceptable rate of eradication and low adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26106466PMC4430795W2115124484What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.