ArticleConflict and health2015
Assessments of health services availability in humanitarian emergencies: a review of assessments in Haiti and Sudan using a health systems approach.
Article in Conflict and health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modelling excess mortality from non-communicable diseases during wartime: application to the Gaza Strip, occupied Palestinian territories.Population health metrics · 2025Article
- Health conditions of older adults in complex humanitarian settings in low- and middle-income countries: a retrospective analysis of 2019-2025 data from Médecins Sans Frontières-supported inpatient departments.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Research priorities for cardiometabolic syndrome in humanitarian settings: A global consensus-based agenda.Journal of migration and health · 2025Article
- Exploring the patient perspective in pulmonary hypertension.The European respiratory journal · 2024Article
- The need for standardised methods of data collection, sharing of data and agency coordination in humanitarian settings.BMJ global health · 2022Review
- Access to health services, food, and water during an active conflict: Evidence from Ethiopia.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Operational considerations for the management of non-communicable diseases in humanitarian emergencies.Conflict and health · 2021Review
- Assessing community health worker service delivery in humanitarian settings.Journal of global health · 2020Article
- Towards systematic evaluation of epidemic responses during humanitarian crises: a scoping review of existing public health evaluation frameworks.BMJ global health · 2020Article
- Conflict and tuberculosis in Sudan: a 10-year review of the National Tuberculosis Programme, 2004-2014.Conflict and health · 2018Article
- Six-monthly appointment spacing for clinical visits as a model for retention in HIV Care in Conakry-Guinea: a cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2017Article
- Non-communicable diseases in humanitarian settings: ten essential questions.Conflict and health · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssessing the availability of health services during humanitarian emergencies is essential for understanding the capacities and weaknesses of disrupted health systems. To improve the consistency of health facilities assessments, the World Health Organization has proposed the use of the Health Resources Availability Mapping System (HeRAMS) developed in Darfur, Sudan as a standardized assessment tool for use in future acute and protracted crises. This study provides an evaluation of HeRAMS' comprehensiveness, and investigates the methods, quality and comprehensiveness of health facilities data and tools in Haiti, where HeRAMS was not used. METHODS AND
findingsTools and databases containing health facilities data in Haiti were collected using a snowball sampling technique, while HeRAMS was purposefully evaluated in Sudan. All collected tools were assessed for quality and comprehensiveness using a coding scheme based on the World Health Organization's health systems building blocks, the Global Health Cluster Suggested Set of Core Indicators and Benchmarks by Category, and the Sphere Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. Eight assessments and databases were located in Haiti, and covered a median of 3.5 of the 6 health system building blocks, 4.5 of the 14 Sphere standards, and 2 of the 9 Health Cluster indicators. None of the assessments covered all of the indicators in any of the assessment criteria and many lacked basic data, limiting the detail of analysis possible for calculating standardized benchmarks and indicators. In Sudan, HeRAMS collected data on 5 of the 6 health system building blocks, 13 of the 14 Sphere Standards, and collected data to allow the calculation of 7 of the 9 Health Cluster Core Indicators and Benchmarks.
conclusionsThere is a need to agree upon essential health facilities data in disrupted health systems during humanitarian emergencies. Although the quality of the assessments in Haiti was generally poor, the large number of platforms and assessment tools deployed suggests that health facilities data can be collected even during acute emergencies. Further consensus is needed to establish essential criteria for data collection and to establish a core group of health systems assessment experts to be deployed during future emergencies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.