Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26106397›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2015

Biotechnological strategies and tools for Plum pox virus resistance: trans-, intra-, cis-genesis, and beyond.

Vincenza Ilardi, Mario Tavazza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. CRISPR/Cas as a Genome-Editing Technique in Fruit Tree Breeding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spontaneous, Artificial, and Genome Editing-Mediated Mutations inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. The RyThe New phytologist · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. DecipheringMetabolites · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Production, pomological and nutraceutical properties of apricot.Journal of food science and technology · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  19. The apricot (Horticulture research · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vincenza IlardiCentro di Ricerca per la Patologia Vegetale, Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l'Analisi dell'Economia Agraria , Rome, Italy.
Mario TavazzaUTAGRI Centro Ricerche Casaccia, Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile , Rome, Italy.
Centro di Ricerca per la Patologia Vegetale · ITNational Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plum pox virus (PPV) is the etiological agent of sharka, the most devastating and economically important viral disease affecting Prunus species. It is widespread in most stone fruits producing countries even though eradication and quarantine programs are in place. The development of resistant cultivars and rootstocks remains the most ecologically and economically suitable approach to achieve long-term control of sharka disease. However, the few PPV resistance genetic resources found in Prunus germplasm along with some intrinsic biological features of stone fruit trees pose limits for efficient and fast breeding programs. This review focuses on an array of biotechnological strategies and tools, which have been used, or may be exploited to confer PPV resistance. A considerable number of scientific studies clearly indicate that robust and predictable resistance can be achieved by transforming plant species with constructs encoding intron-spliced hairpin RNAs homologous to conserved regions of the PPV genome. In addition, we discuss how recent advances in our understanding of PPV biology can be profitably exploited to develop viral interference strategies. In particular, genetic manipulation of host genes by which PPV accomplishes its infection cycle already permits the creation of intragenic resistant plants. Finally, we review the emerging genome editing technologies based on ZFN, TALEN and CRISPR/Cas9 engineered nucleases and how the knockout of host susceptibility genes will open up next generation of PPV resistant plants.

Indexed as

cisgenesisCRISPR/Cas9DEAD-box RNA helicaseseukaryotic translation initiation factorsintragenesisPotyvirusTALENZFN

Identifiers

PMID26106397
PMCPMC4458569
OpenAlexW1524682667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.