Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26106340›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2015

Sensorimotor strategies for recognizing geometrical shapes: a comparative study with different sensory substitution devices.

Fernando Bermejo, Ezequiel A Di Paolo, Mercedes X Hüg, Claudia Arias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multisensory inclusive design with sensory substitution.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF AN AUDIO GAME-INSPIRED AUDITORY MAP INTERFACE.Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Auditory Display. International Conference on Auditory Display · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fernando BermejoCentro de Investigación y Transferencia en Acústica (CINTRA), Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - Facultad Regional Córdoba, Unidad Asociada de CONICET Córdoba, Argentina ; Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Córdoba, Argentina.
Ezequiel A Di PaoloIkerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science Bilbao, Spain ; Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, IAS-Research Center for Life, Mind, and Society, University of the Basque Country San Sebastián, Spain ; Department of Informatics, Centre for Computational Neuroscience and Robotics, University of Sussex Brighton, UK.
Mercedes X HügCentro de Investigación y Transferencia en Acústica (CINTRA), Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - Facultad Regional Córdoba, Unidad Asociada de CONICET Córdoba, Argentina ; Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Córdoba, Argentina ; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Argentina.
Claudia AriasCentro de Investigación y Transferencia en Acústica (CINTRA), Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - Facultad Regional Córdoba, Unidad Asociada de CONICET Córdoba, Argentina ; Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Córdoba, Argentina ; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensorimotor approach proposes that perception is constituted by the mastery of lawful sensorimotor regularities or sensorimotor contingencies (SMCs), which depend on specific bodily characteristics and on actions possibilities that the environment enables and constrains. Sensory substitution devices (SSDs) provide the user information about the world typically corresponding to one sensory modality through the stimulation of another modality. We investigate how perception emerges in novice adult participants equipped with vision-to-auditory SSDs while solving a simple geometrical shape recognition task. In particular, we examine the distinction between apparatus-related SMCs (those originating mostly in properties of the perceptual system) and object-related SMCs (those mostly connected with the perceptual task). We study the sensorimotor strategies employed by participants in three experiments with three different SSDs: a minimalist head-mounted SSD, a traditional, also head-mounted SSD (the vOICe) and an enhanced, hand-held echolocation device. Motor activity and fist-person data are registered and analyzed. Results show that participants are able to quickly learn the necessary skills to distinguish geometric shapes. Comparing the sensorimotor strategies utilized with each SSD we identify differential features of the sensorimotor patterns attributable mostly to the device, which account for the emergence of apparatus-based SMCs. These relate to differences in sweeping strategies between SSDs. We identify, also, components related to the emergence of object-related SMCs. These relate mostly to exploratory movements around the border of a shape. The study provides empirical support for SMC theory and discusses considerations about the nature of perception in sensory substitution.

Indexed as

human echolocationsensorimotor approach to perceptionsensorimotor contingenciessensory substitution

Identifiers

PMID26106340
PMCPMC4460306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.