Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26106067›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2015

Engineering trypsin for inhibitor resistance.

Anna R Batt, Commodore P St Germain, Trevor Gokey, Anton B Guliaev, Teaster Baird

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna R BattDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, 94132.
Commodore P St GermainDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, 94132.
Trevor GokeyDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, 94132.
Anton B GuliaevDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, 94132.
Teaster BairdDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, 94132.
San Francisco State University · US

Funding

UPGRADE OF COMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURET34GM008574 · NIGMS · SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BAYLISS, FRANK T, ESQUERRA, RAYMOND M. · 1996 to 2021
$14.5M
Student EnrichmentP20MD000544 · NIMHD · SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BAIRD, TEASTER T · 2003 to 2012
$9.4M
Metal inhibition of the base excision repair enzymesSC2GM095448 · NIGMS · SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GULIAEV, ANTON · 2011 to 2013
$440k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1SC2GM095448NIGMS NIH HHS T34 GM008574NIGMS NIH HHS T34-GM008574NIMHD NIH HHS P20MD000544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of effective protease therapeutics requires that the proteases be more resistant to naturally occurring inhibitors while maintaining catalytic activity. A key step in developing inhibitor resistance is the identification of key residues in protease-inhibitor interaction. Given that majority of the protease therapeutics currently in use are trypsin-fold, trypsin itself serves as an ideal model for studying protease-inhibitor interaction. To test the importance of several trypsin-inhibitor interactions on the prime-side binding interface, we created four trypsin single variants Y39A, Y39F, K60A, and K60V and report biochemical sensitivity against bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI) and M84R ecotin. All variants retained catalytic activity against small, commercially available peptide substrates [kcat /KM  = (1.2 ± 0.3) × 10(7) M(-1 ) s(-1) . Compared with wild-type, the K60A and K60V variants showed increased sensitivity to BPTI but less sensitivity to ecotin. The Y39A variant was less sensitive to BPTI and ecotin while the Y39F variant was more sensitive to both. The relative binding free energies between BPTI complexes with WT, Y39F, and Y39A were calculated based on 3.5 µs combined explicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations. The BPTI:Y39F complex resulted in the lowest binding energy, while BPTI:Y39A resulted in the highest. Simulations of Y39F revealed increased conformational rearrangement of F39, which allowed formation of a new hydrogen bond between BPTI R17 and H40 of the variant. All together, these data suggest that positions 39 and 60 are key for inhibitor binding to trypsin, and likely more trypsin-fold proteases.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCattleDrug ResistanceKineticsModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationPoint MutationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein EngineeringStructure-Activity RelationshipTrypsinTrypsin Inhibitor, Kazal PancreaticTrypsin InhibitorsTrypsinTrypsin Inhibitor, Kazal PancreaticTrypsin Inhibitorsinhibitorsmolecular dynamicsprotein engineeringserine proteasesserpinstrypsin

Identifiers

PMID26106067
PMCPMC4570540
OpenAlexW1508530289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.