Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26105537›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2015

Forging a signature of in vivo senescence.

Norman E Sharpless, Charles J Sherr

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 693 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
693citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

693 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cellular senescence and aging: molecular mechanisms and convergent pathways.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. p16 Beyond Senescence: Cancer Biology Lessons Applied to Endometriosis.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

633 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Norman E SharplessDepartment of Medicine and Genetics and The Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7295, USA.
Charles J SherrDepartment of Tumor Cell Biology and The Howard Hughes Medical Institute, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105-2794, USA.

Funding

The Role of p16INK4 in Mammalian AgingR01AG024379 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HE, SHENGHUI · 2004 to 2019
$4.6M
In vivo murine models of metastasis for therapeutic testingR01CA163896 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHARPLESS, NORMAN E, WONG, KWOK KIN · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163896NIA NIH HHS R01 AG024379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Cellular senescence', a term originally defining the characteristics of cultured cells that exceed their replicative limit, has been broadened to describe durable states of proliferative arrest induced by disparate stress factors. Proposed relationships between cellular senescence, tumour suppression, loss of tissue regenerative capacity and ageing suffer from lack of uniform definition and consistently applied criteria. Here, we highlight caveats in interpreting the importance of suboptimal senescence-associated biomarkers, expressed either alone or in combination. We advocate that more-specific descriptors be substituted for the now broadly applied umbrella term 'senescence' in defining the suite of diverse physiological responses to cellular stress.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceAnimalsBiomarkersCell CycleCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DNA DamageGenes, p16HumansTelomere ShorteningTumor Suppressor Protein p53BiomarkersCDKN1A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p15Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID26105537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.