Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26105029›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2015

Evaluation of the Methods and Management of Acute Coronary Events (EMMACE)-3: protocol for a longitudinal study.

O A Alabas, R M West, R G Gillott, R Khatib, A S Hall, C P Gale, EMMACE-3 Investigators

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01808027 completednot on this map

Evaluation of the Methods and Management of Acute Coronary Events: 3. Investigating Variation in Hospital Acute Coronary Syndrome Outcomes

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of LeedsRan2011 to 2013Enrolled5,555ConditionsAcute Myocardial Infarction
NCT04598048 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Quality of Life Post-ACS in Participants from EMMACE

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of LeedsRan2020 to 2024Enrolled13,400ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmsQuestionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

O A AlabasDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
R M WestLeeds Institute of Health Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
R G GillottDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
R KhatibDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
A S HallDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
C P GaleDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
EMMACE-3 Investigators

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L01629X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with cardiovascular disease are living longer and are more frequently accessing healthcare resources. The Evaluation of the Methods and Management of Acute Coronary Events (EMMACE)-3 national study is designed to improve understanding of the effect of quality of care on health-related outcomes for patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: EMMACE-3 is a longitudinal study of 5556 patients hospitalised with an ACS in England. The study collects repeated measures of health-related quality of life, information about medications and patient adherence profiles, a survey of hospital facilities, and morbidity and mortality data from linkages to multiple electronic health records. Together with EMMACE-3X and EMMACE-4, EMMACE-3 will assimilate detailed information for about 13 000 patients across more than 60 hospitals in England. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: EMMACE-3 was given a favourable ethical opinion by Leeds (West) Research Ethics committee (REC reference: 10/H131374). On successful application, study data will be shared with academic collaborators. The findings from EMMACE-3 will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, at scientific conferences, the media, and through patient and public involvement. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01808027. Information about the study is also available at EMMACE.org.

Indexed as

HospitalizationQuality of Health CareAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedDisease ManagementEnglandFemaleHealth StatusHospitalsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionQuality of LifeResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID26105029
PMCPMC4480017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.