Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26105014›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2015

High-resolution ultrasound of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve: visualization and initial experience with patients.

Stefan Meng, Doris Lieba-Samal, Lukas F Reissig, Gerlinde M Gruber, Peter C Brugger, Hannes Platzgummer, Gerd Bodner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The sciatic nerve block.BJA education · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan MengDepartment of Radiology, KFJ Hospital, Vienna, Austria, stefan.meng@meduniwien.ac.at.
Doris Lieba-Samal
Lukas F Reissig
Gerlinde M Gruber
Peter C Brugger
Hannes Platzgummer
Gerd Bodner
Medical University of Vienna · ATVienna General Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe posterior femoral cutaneous nerve (PFCN) is a sensory nerve originating from the sacral plexus. PFCN neuropathy leads to pain within the inferior gluteal region and the posterior aspect of the thigh. As electrophysiological assessment is challenging, diagnosis of PFCN neuropathy has been, thus far, primarily based on clinical findings, which can result in misdiagnosis. Therefore, alternative confirmatory assessments such as an imaging modality that could aid in the diagnosis of PFCN neuropathy would be desirable. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of visualization of the PFCN with high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) and to test this technique in our clinical routine. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study consisted of two parts. In the first part, HRUS-guided perineural ink injections along the course of the PFCN were performed at the posterior aspect of the thigh in 26 lower limbs of 14 fresh non-embalmed cadavers. Subsequent dissection confirmed correct identification of the nerve. In the second part, patients with a suspected PFCN neuropathy were examined and a selective HRUS-guided nerve block was performed to verify the suspected diagnosis.

resultsThe PFCN was correctly identified with HRUS in 96.2% (25/26) of cadavers. Further, six patients with a suspected lesion of the PFCN were examined, and the diagnosis was proven by successful HRUS-guided block in all cases.

conclusionWe confirmed the reliable visualization of the PFCN using HRUS. This offers a new technique for the assessment of the PFCN, which could also be demonstrated with the case series presented.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overCadaverFeasibility StudiesFemaleFemoral NerveFemoral NeuropathyHumansLumbosacral PlexusMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID26105014
OpenAlexW2196621275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.