Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26104938›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2015

Preoperative Single-Fraction Partial Breast Radiation Therapy: A Novel Phase 1, Dose-Escalation Protocol With Radiation Response Biomarkers.

Janet K Horton, Rachel C Blitzblau, Sua Yoo, Joseph Geradts, Zheng Chang, Jay A Baker, Gregory S Georgiade, Wei Chen, Sharareh Siamakpour-Reihani, Chunhao Wang and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Preoperative accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy (PHYPORT): state of art and potential clinical application.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  17. Preoperative partial breast radiation for favorable early-stage breast cancer: a narrative review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Janet K HortonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: janet.horton@duke.edu.
Rachel C BlitzblauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Sua YooDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Joseph GeradtsDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Zheng ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jay A BakerDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Gregory S GeorgiadeDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Wei ChenDepartment of Bioinformatics: Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Sharareh Siamakpour-ReihaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Chunhao WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Gloria BroadwaterDepartment of Biostatistics: Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jeff GrothDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Manisha PaltaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Mark DewhirstDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
William T BarryDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eileen A DuffyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jen-Tsan A ChiDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
E Shelley HwangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's HealthK12HD043446 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AMUNDSEN, CINDY · 2002 to 2023
$9.6M
NCI NIH HHS L30 CA142414NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043446NICHD NIH HHS K12HD043446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWomen with biologically favorable early-stage breast cancer are increasingly treated with accelerated partial breast radiation (PBI). However, treatment-related morbidities have been linked to the large postoperative treatment volumes required for external beam PBI. Relative to external beam delivery, alternative PBI techniques require equipment that is not universally available. To address these issues, we designed a phase 1 trial utilizing widely available technology to 1) evaluate the safety of a single radiation treatment delivered preoperatively to the small-volume, intact breast tumor and 2) identify imaging and genomic markers of radiation response. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Women aged ≥55 years with clinically node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, and/or progesterone receptor-positive HER2-, T1 invasive carcinomas, or low- to intermediate-grade in situ disease ≤2 cm were enrolled (n=32). Intensity modulated radiation therapy was used to deliver 15 Gy (n=8), 18 Gy (n=8), or 21 Gy (n=16) to the tumor with a 1.5-cm margin. Lumpectomy was performed within 10 days. Paired pre- and postradiation magnetic resonance images and patient tumor samples were analyzed.

resultsNo dose-limiting toxicity was observed. At a median follow-up of 23 months, there have been no recurrences. Physician-rated cosmetic outcomes were good/excellent, and chronic toxicities were grade 1 to 2 (fibrosis, hyperpigmentation) in patients receiving preoperative radiation only. Evidence of dose-dependent changes in vascular permeability, cell density, and expression of genes regulating immunity and cell death were seen in response to radiation.

conclusionsPreoperative single-dose radiation therapy to intact breast tumors is well tolerated. Radiation response is marked by early indicators of cell death in this biologically favorable patient cohort. This study represents a first step toward a novel partial breast radiation approach. Preoperative radiation should be tested in future clinical trials because it has the potential to challenge the current treatment paradigm and provide a path forward to identify radiation response biomarkers.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFeasibility StudiesFemaleGene ExpressionGenetic MarkersHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedPreoperative CareRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID26104938
PMCPMC4481883
OpenAlexW2023494838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.