Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26104204›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology spectrum2014

Resistance to Isoniazid and Ethionamide in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Genes, Mutations, and Causalities.

Catherine Vilchèze, William R Jacobs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology spectrum, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 276 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Antimicrobial Resistance in Mycobacteria.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Predicting isoniazid resistance inJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. TheMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  13. A Comprehensive Review of Genetic Mechanisms ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine VilchèzeHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461.
William R JacobsHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Validation and Application of a Model for Human-like TB Latency in RabbitsU19AI111276 · NIAID · RBHS-NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI ALLAND, DAVID, HORN, DAVID LOUIS · 2014 to 2020
$23.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS U19 AI111276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isoniazid (INH) is the cornerstone of tuberculosis (TB) chemotherapy, used for both treatment and prophylaxis of TB. The antimycobacterial activity of INH was discovered in 1952, and almost as soon as its activity was published, the first INH-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains were reported. INH and its structural analog and second-line anti-TB drug ethionamide (ETH) are pro-drugs. INH is activated by the catalase-peroxidase KatG, while ETH is activated by the monooxygenase EthA. The resulting active species reacts with NAD+ to form an INH-NAD or ETH-NAD adduct, which inhibits the enoyl ACP reductase InhA, leading to mycolic acid biosynthesis inhibition and mycobacterial cell death. The major mechanism of INH resistance is mutation in katG, encoding the activator of INH. One specific KatG variant, S315T, is found in 94% of INH-resistant clinical isolates. The second mechanism of INH resistance is a mutation in the promoter region of inhA (c-15t), which results in inhA overexpression and leads to titration of the drug. Mutations in the inhA open reading frame and promoter region are also the major mechanism of resistance to ETH, found more often in ETH-resistant clinical isolates than mutations in the activator of ETH. Other mechanisms of resistance to INH and ETH include expression changes of the drugs' activators, redox alteration, drug inactivation, and efflux pump activation. In this article, we describe each known mechanism of resistance to INH and ETH and its importance in M. tuberculosis clinical isolates.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialMutationAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsCatalaseEthionamideIsoniazidMycobacterium tuberculosisOxidoreductasesAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsCatalaseEthionamideInhA protein, MycobacteriumIsoniazidkatG protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisOxidoreductases

Identifiers

PMID26104204
PMCPMC6636829
OpenAlexW2028522909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.