Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26104189›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2015

Using an electronic activity monitor system as an intervention modality: A systematic review.

Zakkoyya H Lewis, Elizabeth J Lyons, Jessica M Jarvis, Jacques Baillargeon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04956393 (Proof-of-Concept of the SOAR), which is not on this map. Cited by 94 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04956393 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Proof-of-Concept of the SOAR (Stop OsteoARthritis) Program: A Randomized Delayed-Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled58ConditionsArthritis, Osteoarthritis, Arthritis Knee, Osteo Arthritis KneeArmsImmediate 8-Week SOAR Program, Delayed 8-Week SOAR Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Effectiveness of Minimal Contact Interventions: An RCT.American journal of preventive medicine · 2021
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zakkoyya H LewisDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, USA. zalewisp@utmb.edu.
Elizabeth J LyonsDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, USA. ellyons@utmb.edu.
Jessica M JarvisDivision of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, USA. jmjarvis@utmb.edu.
Jacques BaillargeonDepartment of Preventive Medicine & Community Health, UTMB, Galveston, TX, USA. jbaillar@utmb.edu.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

UTMB OAIC Research Education Component (REC)P30AG024832 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI JAMES S. GOODWIN, MD, MELISSA M. MORROW · 2005 to 2026
$26.7M
UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000071 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI BRASIER, ALLAN R. · 2012 to 2014
$14.4M
UTMB WOMEN'S HEALTH RESEARCH SCHOLARS PROGRAMK12HD052023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI BERENSON, ABBEY B · 2005 to 2023
$8.1M
LEVEL UP: Video games for activity in breast cancer survivorsK07CA175141 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI LYONS, ELIZABETH J. · 2014 to 2014
$124k
AHRQ HHS R24 HS022134NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000071NCI NIH HHS K07 CA175141NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024832NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD052023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is a growing global health concern that may lead to cardiovascular disease, type II diabetes, and cancer. Several systematic reviews have shown that technology is successful in combating obesity through increased physical activity, but there is no known review on interventions that use an electronic activity monitor system (EAMS). EAMSs are defined as a wearable device that objectively measures lifestyle physical activity and can provide feedback, beyond the display of basic activity count information, via the monitor display or through a partnering application to elicit continual self-monitoring of activity behavior. These devices improve upon standard pedometers because they have the ability to provide visual feedback on activity progression, verbal encouragement, and social comparison. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the efficacy and feasibility results of EAMSs within published physical activity interventions.

methodsElectronic databases and journal references were searched for relevant articles. Data sources included CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Medline Ovid, PsycINFO, and clinicaltrials.gov. Out of the 1,574 retrieved, 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. These articles were reviewed for quality and content based on a risk of bias tool and intervention components.

resultsMost articles were determined to be of medium quality while two were of low quality, and one of high quality. Significant pre-post improvements in the EAMS group were found in five of nine studies for physical activity and in four of five studies for weight. One found a significant increase in physical activity and two studies found significant weight loss in the intervention group compared with the comparator group. The EAMS interventions appear to be feasible with most studies reporting continual wear of the device during waking hours and a higher retention rate of participants in the EAMS groups.

conclusionThese studies provide preliminary evidence suggesting that EAMS can increase physical activity and decrease weight significantly, but their efficacy compared to other interventions has not yet been demonstrated. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the overall effect of EAMS, examine which EAMS features are most effective, and determine which populations are most receptive to an EAMS.

Indexed as

Motor ActivityBiosensing TechniquesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Health PromotionHealth StatusHumansLife StyleObesitySelf Care

Identifiers

PMID26104189
PMCPMC4479243
OpenAlexW1750285878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.