Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26104044›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2015

Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.

Taya Irizarry, Annette DeVito Dabbs, Christine R Curran

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04978233 (Use of the Opal Patient Portal Application for Daily Follow-up of People at Home With COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 413 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
413citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04978233 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Use of the Opal Patient Portal Application for Daily Follow-up of People at Home With COVID-19: The Opal-COVID Feasibility Study

TypeobservationalSponsorDr. Bertrand LeboucheRan2020 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsCOVID-19Armssociodemographic and health, daily self-assessment, and feasibility of using the Opal app for COVID
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

413 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Digital Patient Experience: Umbrella Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Adult patient access to electronic health records.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Framing Effects in Youth E-Cigarette Use Prevention: Individual Text Messages Versus Simulated Text Exchanges.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2023
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Effects of a Personal Health Record in Maternity Care: A Stepped-Wedge Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Digital health technology burden and frustration among patients with multimorbidity.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

353 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taya IrizarrySchool of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. tai19@pitt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0773-327X

Funding

Technology Research in Chronic & Critical IllnessT32NR008857 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Young Ji Lee · 2005 to 2026
$4.0M
NINR NIH HHS 2NR008857NINR NIH HHS T32 NR008857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient portals (ie, electronic personal health records tethered to institutional electronic health records) are recognized as a promising mechanism to support greater patient engagement, yet questions remain about how health care leaders, policy makers, and designers can encourage adoption of patient portals and what factors might contribute to sustained utilization.

objectiveThe purposes of this state of the science review are to (1) present the definition, background, and how current literature addresses the encouragement and support of patient engagement through the patient portal, and (2) provide a summary of future directions for patient portal research and development to meaningfully impact patient engagement.

methodsWe reviewed literature from 2006 through 2014 in PubMed, Ovid Medline, and PsycInfo using the search terms "patient portal" OR "personal health record" OR "electronic personal health record". Final inclusion criterion dictated that studies report on the patient experience and/or ways that patients may be supported to make competent health care decisions and act on those decisions using patient portal functionality.

resultsWe found 120 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Based on the research questions, explicit and implicit aims of the studies, and related measures addressed, the studies were grouped into five major topics (patient adoption, provider endorsement, health literacy, usability, and utility). We discuss the findings and conclusions of studies that address the five topical areas.

conclusionsCurrent research has demonstrated that patients' interest and ability to use patient portals is strongly influenced by personal factors such age, ethnicity, education level, health literacy, health status, and role as a caregiver. Health care delivery factors, mainly provider endorsement and patient portal usability also contribute to patient's ability to engage through and with the patient portal. Future directions of research should focus on identifying specific populations and contextual considerations that would benefit most from a greater degree of patient engagement through a patient portal. Ultimately, adoption by patients and endorsement by providers will come when existing patient portal features align with patients' and providers' information needs and functionality.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHealth Records, PersonalPatient ParticipationAge FactorsCaregiversEducational StatusEthnicityHealth LiteracyHealth Services Needs and DemandHealth StatusHumansResearchelectronic personal health recordmeaningful usepatient engagementpatient portal

Identifiers

PMID26104044
PMCPMC4526960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.