Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26103993›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2015

Molecular Evidence for Functional Divergence and Decay of a Transcription Factor Derived from Whole-Genome Duplication in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Melissa D Lehti-Shiu, Sahra Uygun, Gaurav D Moghe, Nicholas Panchy, Liang Fang, David E Hufnagel, Hannah L Jasicki, Michael Feig, Shin-Han Shiu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. BnaCIPK9 homoeologs mediate the dosage-dependent regulation of seed oil in allotetraploid Brassica napus L.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Breeding of Winter-Hardy Malting Barley.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Robust predictions of specialized metabolism genes through machine learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  15. Angiosperm-Wide and Family-Level Analyses ofFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa D Lehti-ShiuDepartment of Plant Biology (M.D.L.-S., D.E.H., S.-H.S.), Genetics Program (S.U., N.P., S.-H.S.), Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory (S.U.), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (G.D.M., L.F., M.F.), and Department of Chemistry (M.F.), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824; andLaPorte High School, LaPorte, Indiana 46350 (H.L.J.) lehtishi@msu.edu shius@msu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1985-2687
Sahra UygunDepartment of Plant Biology (M.D.L.-S., D.E.H., S.-H.S.), Genetics Program (S.U., N.P., S.-H.S.), Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory (S.U.), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (G.D.M., L.F., M.F.), and Department of Chemistry (M.F.), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824; andLaPorte High School, LaPorte, Indiana 46350 (H.L.J.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0863-0384
Gaurav D MogheDepartment of Plant Biology (M.D.L.-S., D.E.H., S.-H.S.), Genetics Program (S.U., N.P., S.-H.S.), Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory (S.U.), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (G.D.M., L.F., M.F.), and Department of Chemistry (M.F.), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824; andLaPorte High School, LaPorte, Indiana 46350 (H.L.J.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8761-064X
Nicholas PanchyDepartment of Plant Biology (M.D.L.-S., D.E.H., S.-H.S.), Genetics Program (S.U., N.P., S.-H.S.), Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory (S.U.), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (G.D.M., L.F., M.F.), and Department of Chemistry (M.F.), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824; andLaPorte High School, LaPorte, Indiana 46350 (H.L.J.).
Liang FangDepartment of Plant Biology (M.D.L.-S., D.E.H., S.-H.S.), Genetics Program (S.U., N.P., S.-H.S.), Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory (S.U.), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (G.D.M., L.F., M.F.), and Department of Chemistry (M.F.), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824; andLaPorte High School, LaPorte, Indiana 46350 (H.L.J.).
David E HufnagelDepartment of Plant Biology (M.D.L.-S., D.E.H., S.-H.S.), Genetics Program (S.U., N.P., S.-H.S.), Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory (S.U.), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (G.D.M., L.F., M.F.), and Department of Chemistry (M.F.), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824; andLaPorte High School, LaPorte, Indiana 46350 (H.L.J.).
Hannah L JasickiDepartment of Plant Biology (M.D.L.-S., D.E.H., S.-H.S.), Genetics Program (S.U., N.P., S.-H.S.), Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory (S.U.), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (G.D.M., L.F., M.F.), and Department of Chemistry (M.F.), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824; andLaPorte High School, LaPorte, Indiana 46350 (H.L.J.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7062-0318
Michael FeigDepartment of Plant Biology (M.D.L.-S., D.E.H., S.-H.S.), Genetics Program (S.U., N.P., S.-H.S.), Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory (S.U.), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (G.D.M., L.F., M.F.), and Department of Chemistry (M.F.), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824; andLaPorte High School, LaPorte, Indiana 46350 (H.L.J.).
Shin-Han ShiuDepartment of Plant Biology (M.D.L.-S., D.E.H., S.-H.S.), Genetics Program (S.U., N.P., S.-H.S.), Department of Energy Plant Research Laboratory (S.U.), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (G.D.M., L.F., M.F.), and Department of Chemistry (M.F.), Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824; andLaPorte High School, LaPorte, Indiana 46350 (H.L.J.) lehtishi@msu.edu shius@msu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6470-235X
Carnegie Department of Plant Biology · USMichigan State University · USUnited States Department of Energy · US

Funding

Protein structure refinement through effective sampling and scoringR01GM084953 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FEIG, MICHAEL · 2008 to 2017
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional divergence between duplicate transcription factors (TFs) has been linked to critical events in the evolution of land plants and can result from changes in patterns of expression, binding site divergence, and/or interactions with other proteins. Although plant TFs tend to be retained post polyploidization, many are lost within tens to hundreds of million years. Thus, it can be hypothesized that some TFs in plant genomes are in the process of becoming pseudogenes. Here, we use a pair of salt tolerance-conferring transcription factors, DWARF AND DELAYED FLOWERING1 (DDF1) and DDF2, that duplicated through paleopolyploidy 50 to 65 million years ago, as examples to illustrate potential mechanisms leading to duplicate retention and loss. We found that the expression patterns of Arabidopsis thaliana (At)DDF1 and AtDDF2 have diverged in a highly asymmetric manner, and AtDDF2 has lost most inferred ancestral stress responses. Consistent with promoter disablement, the AtDDF2 promoter has fewer predicted cis-elements and a methylated repetitive element. Through comparisons of AtDDF1, AtDDF2, and their Arabidopsis lyrata orthologs, we identified significant differences in binding affinities and binding site preference. In particular, an AtDDF2-specific substitution within the DNA-binding domain significantly reduces binding affinity. Cross-species analyses indicate that both AtDDF1 and AtDDF2 are under selective constraint, but among A. thaliana accessions, AtDDF2 has a higher level of nonsynonymous nucleotide diversity compared with AtDDF1. This may be the result of selection in different environments or may point toward the possibility of ongoing functional decay despite retention for millions of years after gene duplication.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationAmino Acid SequenceArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBinding SitesCold TemperatureEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenetic VariationGenome, PlantModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPlant RootsPlant ShootsProtein BindingArabidopsis ProteinsDDF1 protein, ArabidopsisDDF2 protein, ArabidopsisSodium ChlorideTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26103993
PMCPMC4528766
OpenAlexW2147293063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.