Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26103968›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2015

Asymptomatic transmission and the resurgence of Bordetella pertussis.

Benjamin M Althouse, Samuel V Scarpino

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03942406 (Phase 2b Study of BPZE1 Intranasal Pertussis Vaccine in Adults to Assess Immunological Response and Safety Profile of 1-Dose), which is not on this map. Cited by 162 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
18.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03942406 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Phase 2b Study of BPZE1 Intranasal Pertussis Vaccine in Adults to Assess Immunological Response and Safety Profile of 1-Dose (Prime) and 2-Doses (Prime+Boost) Schedule, Compared to a Boostrix™ Prime Dose With or Without a BPZE1 Boost Dose

TypeinterventionalSponsorILiAD BiotechnologiesRan2019 to 2020Enrolled300ConditionsPertussis, Whooping CoughArmsBPZE1 pertussis vaccine and VaxINator(TM) Atomization Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 267 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pertactin deficiency ofHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Controlled Human Infection With Bordetella pertussis Induces Asymptomatic, Immunizing Colonization.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. CD4+ T-cell immunity toDiscover immunity · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin M AlthouseSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA. althouse@santafe.edu.
Samuel V ScarpinoSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA. scarpino@santafe.edu.
Santa Fe Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recent increase in whooping cough incidence (primarily caused by Bordetella pertussis) presents a challenge to both public health practitioners and scientists trying to understand the mechanisms behind its resurgence. Three main hypotheses have been proposed to explain the resurgence: 1) waning of protective immunity from vaccination or natural infection over time, 2) evolution of B. pertussis to escape protective immunity, and 3) low vaccine coverage. Recent studies have suggested a fourth mechanism: asymptomatic transmission from individuals vaccinated with the currently used acellular B. pertussis vaccines.

methodsUsing wavelet analyses of B. pertussis incidence in the United States (US) and United Kingdom (UK) and a phylodynamic analysis of 36 clinical B. pertussis isolates from the US, we find evidence in support of asymptomatic transmission of B. pertussis. Next, we examine the clinical, public health, and epidemiological consequences of asymptomatic B. pertussis transmission using a mathematical model.

resultsWe find that: 1) the timing of changes in age-specific attack rates observed in the US and UK are consistent with asymptomatic transmission; 2) the phylodynamic analysis of the US sequences indicates more genetic diversity in the overall bacterial population than would be suggested by the observed number of infections, a pattern expected with asymptomatic transmission; 3) asymptomatic infections can bias assessments of vaccine efficacy based on observations of B. pertussis-free weeks; 4) asymptomatic transmission can account for the observed increase in B. pertussis incidence; and 5) vaccinating individuals in close contact with infants too young to receive the vaccine ("cocooning" unvaccinated children) may be ineffective.

conclusionsAlthough a clear role for the previously suggested mechanisms still exists, asymptomatic transmission is the most parsimonious explanation for many of the observations surrounding the resurgence of B. pertussis in the US and UK. These results have important implications for B. pertussis vaccination policy and present a complicated scenario for achieving herd immunity and B. pertussis eradication.

Indexed as

Bordetella pertussisChildHumansIncidenceInfantMaleModels, TheoreticalPertussis VaccineUnited KingdomUnited StatesVaccinationWhooping CoughPertussis Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID26103968
PMCPMC4482312
OpenAlexW1564419957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.