Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26103945›Full record

ArticleHeredity2015

Toward a genome-wide approach for detecting hybrids: informative SNPs to detect introgression between domestic cats and European wildcats (Felis silvestris).

R Oliveira, E Randi, F Mattucci, J D Kurushima, L A Lyons, P C Alves

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

R Oliveira1] CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, InBIO-Laboratório Associado, Vairão, Portugal [2] Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
E Randi1] Laboratorio di Genetica, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA), Bologna, Italy [2] Department 18/Section of Environmental Engineering, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
F MattucciLaboratorio di Genetica, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA), Bologna, Italy.
J D KurushimaDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
L A Lyons1] Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA [2] Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MI, USA.
P C Alves1] CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, InBIO-Laboratório Associado, Vairão, Portugal [2] Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal [3] Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale · ITUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

Genetic Mapping Resources for Common Mammalian DiseasesR24RR016094 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LYONS, LESLIE A · 2002 to 2011
$3.0M
Genetic Mapping Resources for Common Mammalian DiseasesR24OD010928 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI LYONS, LESLIE A · 2012 to 2015
$911k
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR016094NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR016094R24NIH HHS R24 OD010928NIH HHS R24OD010928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endemic gene pools have been severely endangered by human-mediated hybridization, which is posing new challenges in the conservation of several vertebrate species. The endangered European wildcat is an example of this problem, as several natural populations are suffering introgression of genes from the domestic cat. The implementation of molecular methods for detecting hybridization is crucial for supporting appropriate conservation programs on the wildcat. In this study, genetic variation at 158 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was analyzed in 139 domestic cats, 130 putative European wildcats and 5 captive-bred hybrids (N=274). These SNPs were variable both in wild (HE=0.107) and domestic cats (HE=0.340). Although we did not find any SNP that was private in any population, 22 SNPs were monomorphic in wildcats and pairwise FCT values revealed marked differences between domestic and wildcats, with the most divergent 35 loci providing an average FCT>0.74. The power of all the loci to accurately identify admixture events and discriminate the different hybrid categories was evaluated. Results from simulated and real genotypes show that the 158 SNPs provide successful estimates of admixture, with 100% hybrid individuals (two to three generations in the past) being correctly identified in STRUCTURE and over 92% using the NEWHYBRIDS' algorithm. None of the unclassified cats were wrongly allocated to another hybrid class. Thirty-five SNPs, showing the highest FCT values, provided the most parsimonious panel for robust inferences of parental and first generations of admixed ancestries. This approach may be used to further reconstruct the evolution of wildcat populations and, hopefully, to develop sound conservation guidelines for its legal protection in Europe.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationHybridization, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsAnimals, WildBayes TheoremCatsConservation of Natural ResourcesEuropeGenotypePets

Identifiers

PMID26103945
PMCPMC4814236
OpenAlexW1579490666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.