Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26103605›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in lipidology2015

What an anticardiovascular diet should be in 2015.

David R Jacobs, Linda C Tapsell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in lipidology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Healthy Diets and Lung Health. Connecting the Dots.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David R JacobsaDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA bSchool of Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Linda C Tapsell

Funding

EPIDEMIOLOGY: OXIDATIVE STRESS AND EARLY ATHEROSCLEROSISR01HL053560 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI GROSS, MYRON D, JACOBS, DAVID R · 1995 to 2014
$9.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL053560NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL 53560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewGiven scientific and public debate about optimal diet to prevent cardiovascular disease, and interest in diet and other chronic diseases, we propose that following a few simple dietary principles would reduce chronic disease incidence. RECENT

findingsNutrition research has been criticized for focusing on individual nutrients and foods, treated like drug therapy. With a few important exceptions, clinical trials of supplemental nutrients have not shown benefit. Although highly specific nutrition information is elusive, diet patterns have provided consistent answers, important for public health. Observational cohort studies have found that some dietary patterns are reported with high reliability over long periods and predict future cardiovascular and other inflammatory-related diseases. Two randomized clinical trials confirmed this finding. There are many common features of Mediterranean and prudent diets, particularly the plant-centered aspect, coupled with variety of foods eaten. A dietary pattern characterized by high fruit, vegetable, legume, whole grain, nut, berry, seed, and fish intakes, and possibly by intakes of dairy, coffee, tea, chocolate, and alcohol (not in excess), but low meat and detrimentally processed foods is associated with reduced incidence of cardiovascular disease and rates of noncardiovascular, noncancer chronic inflammatory-related mortality. SUMMARY: A plant-centered diet may be broadly recommended.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesDietDiet, MediterraneanFoodHumans

Identifiers

PMID26103605
PMCPMC4557621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.